Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Political Communication |
Publication status | Published - 15 Jul 2020 |
Abstract
Court, the determining factors behind whether court decisions are featured in the German media (i.e., that they receive media coverage in at least one newspaper article) are expounded. A local text alignment measurement of court decisions and newspaper articles enables media coverage to be identified based on original data on 3,404 decisions and 9,436 newspaper articles from between 2008 and 2018. The results demonstrate that media coverage of the German Court is not affected by declarations of unconstitutionality, though coverage is more likely when a decision is accompanied by a press release, an oral hearing, a dissenting opinion, or a combination of all three items. As these decisional aspects are the prerogative of the FCC, the results demonstrate that the German Constitutional Court has the necessary instruments to independently influence media coverage.
Keywords
- judicial politics, constitutional courts, political communication, newsworthiness, Judicial politics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- Political Science and International Relations
- Social Sciences(all)
- Communication
- Social Sciences(all)
- Sociology and Political Science
Research Area (based on ÖFOS 2012)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- Media and Communication Sciences
- Media and Communication Sciences
- Media analysis
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Political Communication, 15.07.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Explaining media coverage of Constitutional Court decisions in Germany
T2 - The role of case characteristics
AU - Meyer, Philipp
N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Without the helpful tips and guidance from Christoph Hönnige, Philipp Köker, and Dominic Nyhuis, this paper probably would not have been written. I thank you. I am also very grateful to Christoph Garwe, Martin Oertzen, and the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions for improving this paper. I would also like to thank Nina, Monika and Norbert Meyer, Rabea Deem, and Katrin Aschmann for their moral support.
PY - 2020/7/15
Y1 - 2020/7/15
N2 - Research on the media coverage of decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court has revealed that the newsworthiness of a court decision – as determined by specific case characteristics – influences the likelihood that the decision will be covered by the media. However, in the context of European constitutional courts, media coverage of court decisions can be understood to be a form of justice reporting that focuses on general public interest and is operationalized by case characteristics that indicate the newsworthiness of the decisions. Using the case of the German Federal ConstitutionalCourt, the determining factors behind whether court decisions are featured in the German media (i.e., that they receive media coverage in at least one newspaper article) are expounded. A local text alignment measurement of court decisions and newspaper articles enables media coverage to be identified based on original data on 3,404 decisions and 9,436 newspaper articles from between 2008 and 2018. The results demonstrate that media coverage of the German Court is not affected by declarations of unconstitutionality, though coverage is more likely when a decision is accompanied by a press release, an oral hearing, a dissenting opinion, or a combination of all three items. As these decisional aspects are the prerogative of the FCC, the results demonstrate that the German Constitutional Court has the necessary instruments to independently influence media coverage.
AB - Research on the media coverage of decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court has revealed that the newsworthiness of a court decision – as determined by specific case characteristics – influences the likelihood that the decision will be covered by the media. However, in the context of European constitutional courts, media coverage of court decisions can be understood to be a form of justice reporting that focuses on general public interest and is operationalized by case characteristics that indicate the newsworthiness of the decisions. Using the case of the German Federal ConstitutionalCourt, the determining factors behind whether court decisions are featured in the German media (i.e., that they receive media coverage in at least one newspaper article) are expounded. A local text alignment measurement of court decisions and newspaper articles enables media coverage to be identified based on original data on 3,404 decisions and 9,436 newspaper articles from between 2008 and 2018. The results demonstrate that media coverage of the German Court is not affected by declarations of unconstitutionality, though coverage is more likely when a decision is accompanied by a press release, an oral hearing, a dissenting opinion, or a combination of all three items. As these decisional aspects are the prerogative of the FCC, the results demonstrate that the German Constitutional Court has the necessary instruments to independently influence media coverage.
KW - judicial politics
KW - constitutional courts
KW - political communication
KW - newsworthiness
KW - Judicial politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088149632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10584609.2020.1784329
DO - 10.1080/10584609.2020.1784329
M3 - Article
JO - Political Communication
JF - Political Communication
SN - 1058-4609
ER -