Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105425 |
| Journal | Landscape and urban planning |
| Volume | 263 |
| Early online date | 22 Jun 2025 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2025 |
Abstract
In Europe, strategic spatial planning is increasingly recognized as a public-sector-led approach that brings together multiple actors in collaborative settings to build long-term visions for urban development. Despite the growing importance of urban green spaces (UGS) in fostering sustainable and liveable cities, systematic longitudinal and comparative analyses of UGS integration into strategic urban plans remain scarce. Drawing on established normative criteria for “good” strategic plans and evidence from practice, we propose an evaluation framework to assess the communication-oriented, evidence-based, action-oriented, collaborative and adaptive dimensions of plans. We apply the framework to three generations of strategic plans from 18 Romanian cities. Our results indicate that, while UGS are frequently mentioned, their integration into actionable strategies is inconsistent. We observe, however, a positive trend in the incorporation of UGS into successive plan iterations. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use a longitudinal research design to systematically assess changes in the quality of strategic urban plans, with a particular focus on UGS. We discuss our framework and findings in the context of broader debates about the nature of strategic planning and the mainstreaming of environmental aspects into strategic plans. Applying the framework in different countries and planning contexts could assess its transferability and reveal how institutional arrangements, planning traditions, and socio-political environments influence the quality of strategic plans over time.
Keywords
- Collaborative, Green infrastructure, Longitudinal analysis, Plan evaluation, Strategic planning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Ecology
- Social Sciences(all)
- Urban Studies
- Environmental Science(all)
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Environmental Science(all)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Landscape and urban planning, Vol. 263, 105425, 11.2025.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating trends in the consideration of urban green spaces in strategic spatial planning
T2 - Insights from Romania
AU - Slave, Andreea Raluca
AU - Popa, Ana Maria
AU - Onose, Diana Andreea
AU - Esmail, Blal Adem
AU - Albert, Christian
AU - Hossu, Constantina Alina
AU - Iojă, Ioan Cristian
AU - Gradinaru, Simona R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - In Europe, strategic spatial planning is increasingly recognized as a public-sector-led approach that brings together multiple actors in collaborative settings to build long-term visions for urban development. Despite the growing importance of urban green spaces (UGS) in fostering sustainable and liveable cities, systematic longitudinal and comparative analyses of UGS integration into strategic urban plans remain scarce. Drawing on established normative criteria for “good” strategic plans and evidence from practice, we propose an evaluation framework to assess the communication-oriented, evidence-based, action-oriented, collaborative and adaptive dimensions of plans. We apply the framework to three generations of strategic plans from 18 Romanian cities. Our results indicate that, while UGS are frequently mentioned, their integration into actionable strategies is inconsistent. We observe, however, a positive trend in the incorporation of UGS into successive plan iterations. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use a longitudinal research design to systematically assess changes in the quality of strategic urban plans, with a particular focus on UGS. We discuss our framework and findings in the context of broader debates about the nature of strategic planning and the mainstreaming of environmental aspects into strategic plans. Applying the framework in different countries and planning contexts could assess its transferability and reveal how institutional arrangements, planning traditions, and socio-political environments influence the quality of strategic plans over time.
AB - In Europe, strategic spatial planning is increasingly recognized as a public-sector-led approach that brings together multiple actors in collaborative settings to build long-term visions for urban development. Despite the growing importance of urban green spaces (UGS) in fostering sustainable and liveable cities, systematic longitudinal and comparative analyses of UGS integration into strategic urban plans remain scarce. Drawing on established normative criteria for “good” strategic plans and evidence from practice, we propose an evaluation framework to assess the communication-oriented, evidence-based, action-oriented, collaborative and adaptive dimensions of plans. We apply the framework to three generations of strategic plans from 18 Romanian cities. Our results indicate that, while UGS are frequently mentioned, their integration into actionable strategies is inconsistent. We observe, however, a positive trend in the incorporation of UGS into successive plan iterations. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use a longitudinal research design to systematically assess changes in the quality of strategic urban plans, with a particular focus on UGS. We discuss our framework and findings in the context of broader debates about the nature of strategic planning and the mainstreaming of environmental aspects into strategic plans. Applying the framework in different countries and planning contexts could assess its transferability and reveal how institutional arrangements, planning traditions, and socio-political environments influence the quality of strategic plans over time.
KW - Collaborative
KW - Green infrastructure
KW - Longitudinal analysis
KW - Plan evaluation
KW - Strategic planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105008529933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105425
DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105425
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008529933
VL - 263
JO - Landscape and urban planning
JF - Landscape and urban planning
SN - 0169-2046
M1 - 105425
ER -