Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 117351 |
Journal | GEODERMA |
Volume | 459 |
Early online date | 23 May 2025 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2025 |
Abstract
Iron oxides, exhibiting positive surface charge in most acidic to neutral soils, are key inorganic agents for microaggregate formation, especially via their electrostatic interactions with negatively charged surfaces on organic and inorganic soil compounds. Yet, little is known on the influence of Fe oxide properties, i.e., size, shape, and surface charge on the formation of soil microaggregates (SMA). Here the aggregation of < 20 μm small SMA fractions in the presence of either ferrihydrite or goethite as well as the stability of the resulting aggregates were examined. Water stable small SMA fractions were isolated from Ap-horizons of Stagnic Luvisols under different management (cropped and bare fallow), and both had an average diameter of ∼ 6 μm. Ferrihydrite and goethite, respectively, were added as suspensions to small SMA fractions at 1 or 5 wt%. For comparison, humic acid (HA), a common fraction of soil organic matter, was added at 1 wt% in solution. Laser diffraction was applied to determine changes in the hydrodynamic diameter and the stability of the resulting aggregates. Addition of Fe oxides facilitated the formation of 3 − 10 μm SMA, which probably resulted from their aggregation with < 3 μm particles in the small SMA fractions via electrostatic attraction. Moreover, changes in the particle size distribution also suggested that the addition of Fe oxides decreased the share of > 10 μm SMA, thereby increasing the abundance of 3 − 10 μm small SMA as well. Here it is likely that attachment of Fe oxides on SMA caused a rearrangement of their structure leading to a closer packing of particles. A generally higher decrease in the abundance of > 10 μm SMA in the ferrihydrite addition implied a more efficient compacting effect of ferrihydrite than that of goethite. This was presumably due to the smaller size of ferrihydrite, which can decrease the steric hindrance and provide more contact points. Changes in the size distribution of small SMA fractions were more pronounced after the addition of 5.0 wt% Fe oxides compared to the 1.0 wt% ones. In contrast, adsorption of the added HA on SMA increased their negative surface charges and steric hindrance between them, thereby favoring their dispersion rather than aggregation. In the stability test, both ferrihydrite and goethite showed a less effective stabilizing effect on SMA at the bare fallow site than the cropped one. However, ferrihydrite generally revealed a better ability to stabilize < 1 μm colloids in the small SMA fraction than goethite for both sites. Here, our study provides new insights into the abilities of different Fe oxides to form and stabilize aggregates in soil microaggregation.
Keywords
- Aggregate stability, Humic acid, Iron oxides, Size distribution of aggregates, Soil colloids, Soil microaggregation, Surface charge
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Soil Science
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: GEODERMA, Vol. 459, 117351, 07.2025.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Elucidating the role of ferrihydrite and goethite in the aggregation and stability of small soil microaggregates
T2 - An experimental study on arable Luvisols under different management
AU - Tang, Ni
AU - Siebers, Nina
AU - Dultz, Stefan
AU - Klumpp, Erwin
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Iron oxides, exhibiting positive surface charge in most acidic to neutral soils, are key inorganic agents for microaggregate formation, especially via their electrostatic interactions with negatively charged surfaces on organic and inorganic soil compounds. Yet, little is known on the influence of Fe oxide properties, i.e., size, shape, and surface charge on the formation of soil microaggregates (SMA). Here the aggregation of < 20 μm small SMA fractions in the presence of either ferrihydrite or goethite as well as the stability of the resulting aggregates were examined. Water stable small SMA fractions were isolated from Ap-horizons of Stagnic Luvisols under different management (cropped and bare fallow), and both had an average diameter of ∼ 6 μm. Ferrihydrite and goethite, respectively, were added as suspensions to small SMA fractions at 1 or 5 wt%. For comparison, humic acid (HA), a common fraction of soil organic matter, was added at 1 wt% in solution. Laser diffraction was applied to determine changes in the hydrodynamic diameter and the stability of the resulting aggregates. Addition of Fe oxides facilitated the formation of 3 − 10 μm SMA, which probably resulted from their aggregation with < 3 μm particles in the small SMA fractions via electrostatic attraction. Moreover, changes in the particle size distribution also suggested that the addition of Fe oxides decreased the share of > 10 μm SMA, thereby increasing the abundance of 3 − 10 μm small SMA as well. Here it is likely that attachment of Fe oxides on SMA caused a rearrangement of their structure leading to a closer packing of particles. A generally higher decrease in the abundance of > 10 μm SMA in the ferrihydrite addition implied a more efficient compacting effect of ferrihydrite than that of goethite. This was presumably due to the smaller size of ferrihydrite, which can decrease the steric hindrance and provide more contact points. Changes in the size distribution of small SMA fractions were more pronounced after the addition of 5.0 wt% Fe oxides compared to the 1.0 wt% ones. In contrast, adsorption of the added HA on SMA increased their negative surface charges and steric hindrance between them, thereby favoring their dispersion rather than aggregation. In the stability test, both ferrihydrite and goethite showed a less effective stabilizing effect on SMA at the bare fallow site than the cropped one. However, ferrihydrite generally revealed a better ability to stabilize < 1 μm colloids in the small SMA fraction than goethite for both sites. Here, our study provides new insights into the abilities of different Fe oxides to form and stabilize aggregates in soil microaggregation.
AB - Iron oxides, exhibiting positive surface charge in most acidic to neutral soils, are key inorganic agents for microaggregate formation, especially via their electrostatic interactions with negatively charged surfaces on organic and inorganic soil compounds. Yet, little is known on the influence of Fe oxide properties, i.e., size, shape, and surface charge on the formation of soil microaggregates (SMA). Here the aggregation of < 20 μm small SMA fractions in the presence of either ferrihydrite or goethite as well as the stability of the resulting aggregates were examined. Water stable small SMA fractions were isolated from Ap-horizons of Stagnic Luvisols under different management (cropped and bare fallow), and both had an average diameter of ∼ 6 μm. Ferrihydrite and goethite, respectively, were added as suspensions to small SMA fractions at 1 or 5 wt%. For comparison, humic acid (HA), a common fraction of soil organic matter, was added at 1 wt% in solution. Laser diffraction was applied to determine changes in the hydrodynamic diameter and the stability of the resulting aggregates. Addition of Fe oxides facilitated the formation of 3 − 10 μm SMA, which probably resulted from their aggregation with < 3 μm particles in the small SMA fractions via electrostatic attraction. Moreover, changes in the particle size distribution also suggested that the addition of Fe oxides decreased the share of > 10 μm SMA, thereby increasing the abundance of 3 − 10 μm small SMA as well. Here it is likely that attachment of Fe oxides on SMA caused a rearrangement of their structure leading to a closer packing of particles. A generally higher decrease in the abundance of > 10 μm SMA in the ferrihydrite addition implied a more efficient compacting effect of ferrihydrite than that of goethite. This was presumably due to the smaller size of ferrihydrite, which can decrease the steric hindrance and provide more contact points. Changes in the size distribution of small SMA fractions were more pronounced after the addition of 5.0 wt% Fe oxides compared to the 1.0 wt% ones. In contrast, adsorption of the added HA on SMA increased their negative surface charges and steric hindrance between them, thereby favoring their dispersion rather than aggregation. In the stability test, both ferrihydrite and goethite showed a less effective stabilizing effect on SMA at the bare fallow site than the cropped one. However, ferrihydrite generally revealed a better ability to stabilize < 1 μm colloids in the small SMA fraction than goethite for both sites. Here, our study provides new insights into the abilities of different Fe oxides to form and stabilize aggregates in soil microaggregation.
KW - Aggregate stability
KW - Humic acid
KW - Iron oxides
KW - Size distribution of aggregates
KW - Soil colloids
KW - Soil microaggregation
KW - Surface charge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005577930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117351
DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117351
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005577930
VL - 459
JO - GEODERMA
JF - GEODERMA
SN - 0016-7061
M1 - 117351
ER -