Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources: a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • University of Milan - Bicocca (UNIMIB)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number1666009
JournalFrontiers in Plant Science
Volume16
Publication statusPublished - 19 Sept 2025

Abstract

Accurate identification of Salicornia species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European Salicornia sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common Salicornia markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European Salicornia taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate Salicornia subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a Salicornia identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.

Keywords

    microsatellite marker fingerprinting, molecular markers, morphology, nuclear DNA content, Salicornia, species delimitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Download
@article{dee23bc87d12437ea0ea38166a57bfc7,
title = "Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources: a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting",
abstract = "Accurate identification of Salicornia species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European Salicornia sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common Salicornia markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European Salicornia taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate Salicornia subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a Salicornia identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.",
keywords = "microsatellite marker fingerprinting, molecular markers, morphology, nuclear DNA content, Salicornia, species delimitation",
author = "Andre Fussy and Samuele Austoni and Traud Winkelmann and Jutta Papenbrock",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2025 Fussy, Austoni, Winkelmann and Papenbrock.",
year = "2025",
month = sep,
day = "19",
doi = "10.3389/fpls.2025.1666009",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Frontiers in Plant Science",
issn = "1664-462X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources

T2 - a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting

AU - Fussy, Andre

AU - Austoni, Samuele

AU - Winkelmann, Traud

AU - Papenbrock, Jutta

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2025 Fussy, Austoni, Winkelmann and Papenbrock.

PY - 2025/9/19

Y1 - 2025/9/19

N2 - Accurate identification of Salicornia species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European Salicornia sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common Salicornia markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European Salicornia taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate Salicornia subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a Salicornia identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.

AB - Accurate identification of Salicornia species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European Salicornia sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common Salicornia markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European Salicornia taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate Salicornia subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a Salicornia identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.

KW - microsatellite marker fingerprinting

KW - molecular markers

KW - morphology

KW - nuclear DNA content

KW - Salicornia

KW - species delimitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105017923403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2025.1666009

DO - 10.3389/fpls.2025.1666009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105017923403

VL - 16

JO - Frontiers in Plant Science

JF - Frontiers in Plant Science

SN - 1664-462X

M1 - 1666009

ER -