Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Maria Peter
  • Tim Diekötter
  • Tim Höffler
  • Kerstin Hildegard Kremer

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Kiel University
  • IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education at Kiel University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-311
Number of pages18
JournalPeople and Nature
Volume3
Issue number2
Early online date3 Mar 2021
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2021

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) is regarded as a promising format in environmental and sustainability education as well as in science education. CS projects often assume that participation in the project influences, for example, participants' knowledge or behaviour. We investigated whether and to what extent biodiversity citizen science (BDCS) projects, from the participants' self-reported perspective, achieve the following six participant outcomes: (a) content, process and nature of science knowledge, (b) skills of science inquiry, (c) self-efficacy for science and the environment, (d) interest in science and the environment, (e) motivation for science and the environment and (f) behaviour towards the environment. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey of 1,160 CS participants across 63 BDCS projects in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Our survey was aimed at adults participating in CS voluntarily. Survey respondents reported positive changes in all six categories. The most notable result across projects was that self-reported increases in knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and motivation were found to be more pronounced when regarding the environment rather than science. Perceived gains in data collection skills were reported to be higher than gains in skills not directly connected to data collection. Reported behaviour changes primarily concerned communication activities, to a lesser degree also gardening activities, and finally more general environmental behaviour. In addition to these six participant outcomes, respondents mentioned a variety of other positive and negative outcomes, for example, health and well-being, enjoyment, a sense of satisfaction, an increased connection to people and nature but also a more pessimistic view regarding the future of the environment. We conclude that BDCS projects could have a high potential for environmental and sustainability education as well as science education. Further research should investigate individual participant outcomes in more depth and should focus on the factors that influence these participant outcomes. Moreover, exploring the perspectives of both project participants and project coordinators would be valuable. In this way, it would be possible to improve the development and design of CS projects. As a result, BDCS projects could more effectively achieve outcomes for the participants, for science and for biodiversity. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Keywords

    behaviour, community-based monitoring, environmental education, interest, knowledge, motivation, participant outcome, science education, self-efficacy, skill

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens. / Peter, Maria; Diekötter, Tim; Höffler, Tim et al.
In: People and Nature, Vol. 3, No. 2, 31.03.2021, p. 294-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Peter, M, Diekötter, T, Höffler, T & Kremer, KH 2021, 'Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens', People and Nature, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10193
Peter, M., Diekötter, T., Höffler, T., & Kremer, K. H. (2021). Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens. People and Nature, 3(2), 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10193
Peter M, Diekötter T, Höffler T, Kremer KH. Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens. People and Nature. 2021 Mar 31;3(2):294-311. Epub 2021 Mar 3. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10193
Peter, Maria ; Diekötter, Tim ; Höffler, Tim et al. / Biodiversity citizen science : Outcomes for the participating citizens. In: People and Nature. 2021 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 294-311.
Download
@article{e8d714443f9344c39731d9dcf5e66595,
title = "Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens",
abstract = "Citizen science (CS) is regarded as a promising format in environmental and sustainability education as well as in science education. CS projects often assume that participation in the project influences, for example, participants' knowledge or behaviour. We investigated whether and to what extent biodiversity citizen science (BDCS) projects, from the participants' self-reported perspective, achieve the following six participant outcomes: (a) content, process and nature of science knowledge, (b) skills of science inquiry, (c) self-efficacy for science and the environment, (d) interest in science and the environment, (e) motivation for science and the environment and (f) behaviour towards the environment. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey of 1,160 CS participants across 63 BDCS projects in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Our survey was aimed at adults participating in CS voluntarily. Survey respondents reported positive changes in all six categories. The most notable result across projects was that self-reported increases in knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and motivation were found to be more pronounced when regarding the environment rather than science. Perceived gains in data collection skills were reported to be higher than gains in skills not directly connected to data collection. Reported behaviour changes primarily concerned communication activities, to a lesser degree also gardening activities, and finally more general environmental behaviour. In addition to these six participant outcomes, respondents mentioned a variety of other positive and negative outcomes, for example, health and well-being, enjoyment, a sense of satisfaction, an increased connection to people and nature but also a more pessimistic view regarding the future of the environment. We conclude that BDCS projects could have a high potential for environmental and sustainability education as well as science education. Further research should investigate individual participant outcomes in more depth and should focus on the factors that influence these participant outcomes. Moreover, exploring the perspectives of both project participants and project coordinators would be valuable. In this way, it would be possible to improve the development and design of CS projects. As a result, BDCS projects could more effectively achieve outcomes for the participants, for science and for biodiversity. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.",
keywords = "behaviour, community-based monitoring, environmental education, interest, knowledge, motivation, participant outcome, science education, self-efficacy, skill",
author = "Maria Peter and Tim Diek{\"o}tter and Tim H{\"o}ffler and Kremer, {Kerstin Hildegard}",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by funding through the Leibniz ScienceCampus {\textquoteleft}Kiel Science Outreach Campus{\textquoteright} (KiSOC). We would like to thank the project coordinators and project participants for being part of this research study and sharing their insights with us. We would also like to thank Cecily Maller, Andr{\'e} Mascarenhas, Tina Phillips, Sara Stewart, Zeeda Mohamad and one anonymous reviewer for their comments on the manuscript. ",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1002/pan3.10193",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "294--311",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity citizen science

T2 - Outcomes for the participating citizens

AU - Peter, Maria

AU - Diekötter, Tim

AU - Höffler, Tim

AU - Kremer, Kerstin Hildegard

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by funding through the Leibniz ScienceCampus ‘Kiel Science Outreach Campus’ (KiSOC). We would like to thank the project coordinators and project participants for being part of this research study and sharing their insights with us. We would also like to thank Cecily Maller, André Mascarenhas, Tina Phillips, Sara Stewart, Zeeda Mohamad and one anonymous reviewer for their comments on the manuscript.

PY - 2021/3/31

Y1 - 2021/3/31

N2 - Citizen science (CS) is regarded as a promising format in environmental and sustainability education as well as in science education. CS projects often assume that participation in the project influences, for example, participants' knowledge or behaviour. We investigated whether and to what extent biodiversity citizen science (BDCS) projects, from the participants' self-reported perspective, achieve the following six participant outcomes: (a) content, process and nature of science knowledge, (b) skills of science inquiry, (c) self-efficacy for science and the environment, (d) interest in science and the environment, (e) motivation for science and the environment and (f) behaviour towards the environment. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey of 1,160 CS participants across 63 BDCS projects in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Our survey was aimed at adults participating in CS voluntarily. Survey respondents reported positive changes in all six categories. The most notable result across projects was that self-reported increases in knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and motivation were found to be more pronounced when regarding the environment rather than science. Perceived gains in data collection skills were reported to be higher than gains in skills not directly connected to data collection. Reported behaviour changes primarily concerned communication activities, to a lesser degree also gardening activities, and finally more general environmental behaviour. In addition to these six participant outcomes, respondents mentioned a variety of other positive and negative outcomes, for example, health and well-being, enjoyment, a sense of satisfaction, an increased connection to people and nature but also a more pessimistic view regarding the future of the environment. We conclude that BDCS projects could have a high potential for environmental and sustainability education as well as science education. Further research should investigate individual participant outcomes in more depth and should focus on the factors that influence these participant outcomes. Moreover, exploring the perspectives of both project participants and project coordinators would be valuable. In this way, it would be possible to improve the development and design of CS projects. As a result, BDCS projects could more effectively achieve outcomes for the participants, for science and for biodiversity. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

AB - Citizen science (CS) is regarded as a promising format in environmental and sustainability education as well as in science education. CS projects often assume that participation in the project influences, for example, participants' knowledge or behaviour. We investigated whether and to what extent biodiversity citizen science (BDCS) projects, from the participants' self-reported perspective, achieve the following six participant outcomes: (a) content, process and nature of science knowledge, (b) skills of science inquiry, (c) self-efficacy for science and the environment, (d) interest in science and the environment, (e) motivation for science and the environment and (f) behaviour towards the environment. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey of 1,160 CS participants across 63 BDCS projects in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Our survey was aimed at adults participating in CS voluntarily. Survey respondents reported positive changes in all six categories. The most notable result across projects was that self-reported increases in knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and motivation were found to be more pronounced when regarding the environment rather than science. Perceived gains in data collection skills were reported to be higher than gains in skills not directly connected to data collection. Reported behaviour changes primarily concerned communication activities, to a lesser degree also gardening activities, and finally more general environmental behaviour. In addition to these six participant outcomes, respondents mentioned a variety of other positive and negative outcomes, for example, health and well-being, enjoyment, a sense of satisfaction, an increased connection to people and nature but also a more pessimistic view regarding the future of the environment. We conclude that BDCS projects could have a high potential for environmental and sustainability education as well as science education. Further research should investigate individual participant outcomes in more depth and should focus on the factors that influence these participant outcomes. Moreover, exploring the perspectives of both project participants and project coordinators would be valuable. In this way, it would be possible to improve the development and design of CS projects. As a result, BDCS projects could more effectively achieve outcomes for the participants, for science and for biodiversity. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

KW - behaviour

KW - community-based monitoring

KW - environmental education

KW - interest

KW - knowledge

KW - motivation

KW - participant outcome

KW - science education

KW - self-efficacy

KW - skill

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106309740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10193

DO - 10.1002/pan3.10193

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 294

EP - 311

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

IS - 2

ER -