Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Axel Ebers
  • Stephan L. Thomsen

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-393
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date10 Feb 2021
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Abstract

Bystander programs contribute to crime prevention by motivating people to intervene in violent situations. Social media allow addressing very specific target groups, and provide valuable information for program evaluation. This paper provides a conceptual framework for conducting benefit-cost analysis of bystander programs and puts a particular focus on the use of social media for program dissemination and data collection. The benefit-cost model treats publicly funded programs as investment projects and calculates the benefit-cost ratio. Program benefit arises from the damages avoided by preventing violent crime. We provide systematic instructions for estimating this benefit. The explained estimation techniques draw on social media data, machine-learning technology, randomized controlled trials and discrete choice experiments. In addition, we introduce a complementary approach with benefits calculated from the public attention generated by the program. To estimate the value of public attention, the approach uses the bid landscaping method, which originates from display advertising. The presented approaches offer the tools to implement a benefit-costs analysis in practice. The growing importance of social media for the dissemination of policy programs requires new evaluation methods. By providing two such methods, this paper contributes to evidence-based decisionmaking in a growing policy area.

Keywords

    Benefit-cost analysis, Bystander programs, Conceptual framework, Discrete choice experiments, Machine learning, Social media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs. / Ebers, Axel; Thomsen, Stephan L.
In: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 2, 06.2021, p. 367-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Ebers, A & Thomsen, SL 2021, 'Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs', Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 367-393. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2020.34
Ebers, A., & Thomsen, S. L. (2021). Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 12(2), 367-393. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2020.34
Ebers A, Thomsen SL. Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 2021 Jun;12(2):367-393. Epub 2021 Feb 10. doi: 10.1017/bca.2020.34
Ebers, Axel ; Thomsen, Stephan L. / Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs. In: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 2021 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 367-393.
Download
@article{20e8472773b0403d8b9ea3e4ec3f07d1,
title = "Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs",
abstract = "Bystander programs contribute to crime prevention by motivating people to intervene in violent situations. Social media allow addressing very specific target groups, and provide valuable information for program evaluation. This paper provides a conceptual framework for conducting benefit-cost analysis of bystander programs and puts a particular focus on the use of social media for program dissemination and data collection. The benefit-cost model treats publicly funded programs as investment projects and calculates the benefit-cost ratio. Program benefit arises from the damages avoided by preventing violent crime. We provide systematic instructions for estimating this benefit. The explained estimation techniques draw on social media data, machine-learning technology, randomized controlled trials and discrete choice experiments. In addition, we introduce a complementary approach with benefits calculated from the public attention generated by the program. To estimate the value of public attention, the approach uses the bid landscaping method, which originates from display advertising. The presented approaches offer the tools to implement a benefit-costs analysis in practice. The growing importance of social media for the dissemination of policy programs requires new evaluation methods. By providing two such methods, this paper contributes to evidence-based decisionmaking in a growing policy area.",
keywords = "Benefit-cost analysis, Bystander programs, Conceptual framework, Discrete choice experiments, Machine learning, Social media",
author = "Axel Ebers and Thomsen, {Stephan L.}",
note = "Funding Information: 1 We like to thank the editor, Amanda Ross, and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions. This research was conducted as part of the joint research project Security Communication via Online Social Networks – An Innovative Approach to Crime Prevention, which was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1017/bca.2020.34",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "367--393",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit-Cost analysis of social media facilitated bystander programs

AU - Ebers, Axel

AU - Thomsen, Stephan L.

N1 - Funding Information: 1 We like to thank the editor, Amanda Ross, and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions. This research was conducted as part of the joint research project Security Communication via Online Social Networks – An Innovative Approach to Crime Prevention, which was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

N2 - Bystander programs contribute to crime prevention by motivating people to intervene in violent situations. Social media allow addressing very specific target groups, and provide valuable information for program evaluation. This paper provides a conceptual framework for conducting benefit-cost analysis of bystander programs and puts a particular focus on the use of social media for program dissemination and data collection. The benefit-cost model treats publicly funded programs as investment projects and calculates the benefit-cost ratio. Program benefit arises from the damages avoided by preventing violent crime. We provide systematic instructions for estimating this benefit. The explained estimation techniques draw on social media data, machine-learning technology, randomized controlled trials and discrete choice experiments. In addition, we introduce a complementary approach with benefits calculated from the public attention generated by the program. To estimate the value of public attention, the approach uses the bid landscaping method, which originates from display advertising. The presented approaches offer the tools to implement a benefit-costs analysis in practice. The growing importance of social media for the dissemination of policy programs requires new evaluation methods. By providing two such methods, this paper contributes to evidence-based decisionmaking in a growing policy area.

AB - Bystander programs contribute to crime prevention by motivating people to intervene in violent situations. Social media allow addressing very specific target groups, and provide valuable information for program evaluation. This paper provides a conceptual framework for conducting benefit-cost analysis of bystander programs and puts a particular focus on the use of social media for program dissemination and data collection. The benefit-cost model treats publicly funded programs as investment projects and calculates the benefit-cost ratio. Program benefit arises from the damages avoided by preventing violent crime. We provide systematic instructions for estimating this benefit. The explained estimation techniques draw on social media data, machine-learning technology, randomized controlled trials and discrete choice experiments. In addition, we introduce a complementary approach with benefits calculated from the public attention generated by the program. To estimate the value of public attention, the approach uses the bid landscaping method, which originates from display advertising. The presented approaches offer the tools to implement a benefit-costs analysis in practice. The growing importance of social media for the dissemination of policy programs requires new evaluation methods. By providing two such methods, this paper contributes to evidence-based decisionmaking in a growing policy area.

KW - Benefit-cost analysis

KW - Bystander programs

KW - Conceptual framework

KW - Discrete choice experiments

KW - Machine learning

KW - Social media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111426802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/bca.2020.34

DO - 10.1017/bca.2020.34

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85111426802

VL - 12

SP - 367

EP - 393

JO - Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

JF - Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

SN - 2194-5888

IS - 2

ER -