Accountability in an agency model: Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Christian Lukas
  • Max Frederik Neubert
  • Jens Robert Schöndube

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-158
Number of pages9
JournalManagerial and Decision Economics
Volume40
Issue number2
Early online date7 Dec 2018
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2019

Abstract

We analyze an agency model of project choice and implementation where the agent is held accountable for his performance. We show that implementation of the ex ante efficient project may be impossible, irrespective of how the principal sets fixed wage and bonus rate. If it is possible, the principal may be forced to increase the bonus rate above the optimal project-specific rate. The higher profit share compensates the agent for pressure he faces when he has to justify/explain his performance.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Accountability in an agency model: Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design. / Lukas, Christian; Neubert, Max Frederik; Schöndube, Jens Robert.
In: Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 06.12.2019, p. 150-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Lukas, C, Neubert, MF & Schöndube, JR 2019, 'Accountability in an agency model: Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design', Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2989
Lukas, C., Neubert, M. F., & Schöndube, J. R. (2019). Accountability in an agency model: Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2989
Lukas C, Neubert MF, Schöndube JR. Accountability in an agency model: Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design. Managerial and Decision Economics. 2019 Dec 6;40(2):150-158. Epub 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1002/mde.2989
Lukas, Christian ; Neubert, Max Frederik ; Schöndube, Jens Robert. / Accountability in an agency model : Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design. In: Managerial and Decision Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 150-158.
Download
@article{23df2e6514d2420a8169eec6ab26a5c3,
title = "Accountability in an agency model: Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design",
abstract = "We analyze an agency model of project choice and implementation where the agent is held accountable for his performance. We show that implementation of the ex ante efficient project may be impossible, irrespective of how the principal sets fixed wage and bonus rate. If it is possible, the principal may be forced to increase the bonus rate above the optimal project-specific rate. The higher profit share compensates the agent for pressure he faces when he has to justify/explain his performance.",
author = "Christian Lukas and Neubert, {Max Frederik} and Sch{\"o}ndube, {Jens Robert}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1002/mde.2989",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "150--158",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability in an agency model

T2 - Project selection, effort incentives, and contract design

AU - Lukas, Christian

AU - Neubert, Max Frederik

AU - Schöndube, Jens Robert

N1 - © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2019/12/6

Y1 - 2019/12/6

N2 - We analyze an agency model of project choice and implementation where the agent is held accountable for his performance. We show that implementation of the ex ante efficient project may be impossible, irrespective of how the principal sets fixed wage and bonus rate. If it is possible, the principal may be forced to increase the bonus rate above the optimal project-specific rate. The higher profit share compensates the agent for pressure he faces when he has to justify/explain his performance.

AB - We analyze an agency model of project choice and implementation where the agent is held accountable for his performance. We show that implementation of the ex ante efficient project may be impossible, irrespective of how the principal sets fixed wage and bonus rate. If it is possible, the principal may be forced to increase the bonus rate above the optimal project-specific rate. The higher profit share compensates the agent for pressure he faces when he has to justify/explain his performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058146933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mde.2989

DO - 10.1002/mde.2989

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058146933

VL - 40

SP - 150

EP - 158

JO - Managerial and Decision Economics

JF - Managerial and Decision Economics

SN - 1099-1468

IS - 2

ER -