Wie institutionelle Hürden die soziale Selektivität der Wahl verschärfen: Das Beispiel von Formfehlern bei der Briefwahl

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)309-324
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftSwiss Political Science Review
Jahrgang30
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 19 Sept. 2024

Abstract

While voting by mail is more convenient than voting in person, it is more complex and therefore more prone to error. This research note examines the extent to which this barrier has a negative impact on the composition of the electorate. It is argued that the higher complexity does not affect all voters equally, but that socially disadvantaged groups tend to make disproportionately more errors when voting by mail, leading to the rejection of the mail ballot. Consequently, voting by mail contributes to an exacerbation of the existing social selectivity of voter participation. We analyse this relation using small-scale data from the city of Bremen, which confirm these expectations.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Wie institutionelle Hürden die soziale Selektivität der Wahl verschärfen: Das Beispiel von Formfehlern bei der Briefwahl. / Nyhuis, Dominic; Harmening, Julien Morten; Swalve, Tilko Arne.
in: Swiss Political Science Review, Jahrgang 30, Nr. 3, 19.09.2024, S. 309-324.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{f576233d9b024ba980ac6d3d92dfc204,
title = "Wie institutionelle H{\"u}rden die soziale Selektivit{\"a}t der Wahl versch{\"a}rfen: Das Beispiel von Formfehlern bei der Briefwahl",
abstract = "While voting by mail is more convenient than voting in person, it is more complex and therefore more prone to error. This research note examines the extent to which this barrier has a negative impact on the composition of the electorate. It is argued that the higher complexity does not affect all voters equally, but that socially disadvantaged groups tend to make disproportionately more errors when voting by mail, leading to the rejection of the mail ballot. Consequently, voting by mail contributes to an exacerbation of the existing social selectivity of voter participation. We analyse this relation using small-scale data from the city of Bremen, which confirm these expectations.",
author = "Dominic Nyhuis and Harmening, {Julien Morten} and Swalve, {Tilko Arne}",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1111/spsr.12609",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "30",
pages = "309--324",
journal = "Swiss Political Science Review",
issn = "1424-7755",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wie institutionelle Hürden die soziale Selektivität der Wahl verschärfen

T2 - Das Beispiel von Formfehlern bei der Briefwahl

AU - Nyhuis, Dominic

AU - Harmening, Julien Morten

AU - Swalve, Tilko Arne

PY - 2024/9/19

Y1 - 2024/9/19

N2 - While voting by mail is more convenient than voting in person, it is more complex and therefore more prone to error. This research note examines the extent to which this barrier has a negative impact on the composition of the electorate. It is argued that the higher complexity does not affect all voters equally, but that socially disadvantaged groups tend to make disproportionately more errors when voting by mail, leading to the rejection of the mail ballot. Consequently, voting by mail contributes to an exacerbation of the existing social selectivity of voter participation. We analyse this relation using small-scale data from the city of Bremen, which confirm these expectations.

AB - While voting by mail is more convenient than voting in person, it is more complex and therefore more prone to error. This research note examines the extent to which this barrier has a negative impact on the composition of the electorate. It is argued that the higher complexity does not affect all voters equally, but that socially disadvantaged groups tend to make disproportionately more errors when voting by mail, leading to the rejection of the mail ballot. Consequently, voting by mail contributes to an exacerbation of the existing social selectivity of voter participation. We analyse this relation using small-scale data from the city of Bremen, which confirm these expectations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198047760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/spsr.12609

DO - 10.1111/spsr.12609

M3 - Artikel

VL - 30

SP - 309

EP - 324

JO - Swiss Political Science Review

JF - Swiss Political Science Review

SN - 1424-7755

IS - 3

ER -

Von denselben Autoren