Stairway to impact or highway to failure? A cognitive perspective on business model design processes in nascent sustainable ventures

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Eduard Esau
  • Christina Lara Kannegießer
  • Manuel Reppmann
  • Erk P. Piening
  • Laura Marie Edinger-Schons

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Hamburg
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
FachzeitschriftStrategic entrepreneurship journal
Frühes Online-Datum2 Jan. 2025
PublikationsstatusElektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 2 Jan. 2025

Abstract

Research Summary: Sustainable new ventures seeking to tackle grand challenges such as climate change or biodiversity loss through new business models face the difficult task of reconciling social and ecological goals with profit. To provide a better understanding of how founders balance such tensions and develop viable business models, this longitudinal case study traces the evolution of business models in six nascent sustainable ventures. We find that depending on the founding team's cognitive configuration (i.e., narrow vs. paradoxical), sustainable new ventures develop business models along two alternative paths. Reflecting different approaches to business model design in terms of what is done, how it is done, and when it is done, these trajectories explain why some ventures survive beyond the proof-of-concept phase while others do not. Managerial Summary: Our study of six sustainable new ventures provides several insights for entrepreneurs on creating viable business models that meet social, ecological, and commercial goals. Founders should pursue a patient, experimental approach to business model design, avoiding early commitments while seeking stakeholder feedback for deeper insights into the challenges at hand. Furthermore, the team's mindset (narrow or paradoxical), influenced by members' value concepts (idealistic or pragmatic), determines the venture's design path. Teams with a paradoxical mindset, simultaneously integrating social, ecological, and economic goals, are more likely to navigate beyond the proof-of-concept phase successfully. Moreover, having idealistic and pragmatic perspectives within the team fosters cognitive diversity, which is crucial to dealing with complex challenges effectively.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Stairway to impact or highway to failure? A cognitive perspective on business model design processes in nascent sustainable ventures. / Esau, Eduard; Kannegießer, Christina Lara; Reppmann, Manuel et al.
in: Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 02.01.2025.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Esau E, Kannegießer CL, Reppmann M, Piening EP, Edinger-Schons LM. Stairway to impact or highway to failure? A cognitive perspective on business model design processes in nascent sustainable ventures. Strategic entrepreneurship journal. 2025 Jan 2. Epub 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1002/sej.1531
Download
@article{9c037615eb454f0da647da54028bbf86,
title = "Stairway to impact or highway to failure?: A cognitive perspective on business model design processes in nascent sustainable ventures",
abstract = "Research Summary: Sustainable new ventures seeking to tackle grand challenges such as climate change or biodiversity loss through new business models face the difficult task of reconciling social and ecological goals with profit. To provide a better understanding of how founders balance such tensions and develop viable business models, this longitudinal case study traces the evolution of business models in six nascent sustainable ventures. We find that depending on the founding team's cognitive configuration (i.e., narrow vs. paradoxical), sustainable new ventures develop business models along two alternative paths. Reflecting different approaches to business model design in terms of what is done, how it is done, and when it is done, these trajectories explain why some ventures survive beyond the proof-of-concept phase while others do not. Managerial Summary: Our study of six sustainable new ventures provides several insights for entrepreneurs on creating viable business models that meet social, ecological, and commercial goals. Founders should pursue a patient, experimental approach to business model design, avoiding early commitments while seeking stakeholder feedback for deeper insights into the challenges at hand. Furthermore, the team's mindset (narrow or paradoxical), influenced by members' value concepts (idealistic or pragmatic), determines the venture's design path. Teams with a paradoxical mindset, simultaneously integrating social, ecological, and economic goals, are more likely to navigate beyond the proof-of-concept phase successfully. Moreover, having idealistic and pragmatic perspectives within the team fosters cognitive diversity, which is crucial to dealing with complex challenges effectively.",
keywords = "business model design, business models, entrepreneurial cognition, new venture creation, sustainable entrepreneurship",
author = "Eduard Esau and Kannegie{\ss}er, {Christina Lara} and Manuel Reppmann and Piening, {Erk P.} and Edinger-Schons, {Laura Marie}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Strategic Management Society.",
year = "2025",
month = jan,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1002/sej.1531",
language = "English",
journal = "Strategic entrepreneurship journal",
issn = "1932-4391",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stairway to impact or highway to failure?

T2 - A cognitive perspective on business model design processes in nascent sustainable ventures

AU - Esau, Eduard

AU - Kannegießer, Christina Lara

AU - Reppmann, Manuel

AU - Piening, Erk P.

AU - Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Strategic Management Society.

PY - 2025/1/2

Y1 - 2025/1/2

N2 - Research Summary: Sustainable new ventures seeking to tackle grand challenges such as climate change or biodiversity loss through new business models face the difficult task of reconciling social and ecological goals with profit. To provide a better understanding of how founders balance such tensions and develop viable business models, this longitudinal case study traces the evolution of business models in six nascent sustainable ventures. We find that depending on the founding team's cognitive configuration (i.e., narrow vs. paradoxical), sustainable new ventures develop business models along two alternative paths. Reflecting different approaches to business model design in terms of what is done, how it is done, and when it is done, these trajectories explain why some ventures survive beyond the proof-of-concept phase while others do not. Managerial Summary: Our study of six sustainable new ventures provides several insights for entrepreneurs on creating viable business models that meet social, ecological, and commercial goals. Founders should pursue a patient, experimental approach to business model design, avoiding early commitments while seeking stakeholder feedback for deeper insights into the challenges at hand. Furthermore, the team's mindset (narrow or paradoxical), influenced by members' value concepts (idealistic or pragmatic), determines the venture's design path. Teams with a paradoxical mindset, simultaneously integrating social, ecological, and economic goals, are more likely to navigate beyond the proof-of-concept phase successfully. Moreover, having idealistic and pragmatic perspectives within the team fosters cognitive diversity, which is crucial to dealing with complex challenges effectively.

AB - Research Summary: Sustainable new ventures seeking to tackle grand challenges such as climate change or biodiversity loss through new business models face the difficult task of reconciling social and ecological goals with profit. To provide a better understanding of how founders balance such tensions and develop viable business models, this longitudinal case study traces the evolution of business models in six nascent sustainable ventures. We find that depending on the founding team's cognitive configuration (i.e., narrow vs. paradoxical), sustainable new ventures develop business models along two alternative paths. Reflecting different approaches to business model design in terms of what is done, how it is done, and when it is done, these trajectories explain why some ventures survive beyond the proof-of-concept phase while others do not. Managerial Summary: Our study of six sustainable new ventures provides several insights for entrepreneurs on creating viable business models that meet social, ecological, and commercial goals. Founders should pursue a patient, experimental approach to business model design, avoiding early commitments while seeking stakeholder feedback for deeper insights into the challenges at hand. Furthermore, the team's mindset (narrow or paradoxical), influenced by members' value concepts (idealistic or pragmatic), determines the venture's design path. Teams with a paradoxical mindset, simultaneously integrating social, ecological, and economic goals, are more likely to navigate beyond the proof-of-concept phase successfully. Moreover, having idealistic and pragmatic perspectives within the team fosters cognitive diversity, which is crucial to dealing with complex challenges effectively.

KW - business model design

KW - business models

KW - entrepreneurial cognition

KW - new venture creation

KW - sustainable entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213991240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sej.1531

DO - 10.1002/sej.1531

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85213991240

JO - Strategic entrepreneurship journal

JF - Strategic entrepreneurship journal

SN - 1932-4391

ER -