Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Katharina Kieslich
  • Amelia Fiske
  • Marie Gaille
  • Ilaria Galasso
  • Susi Geiger
  • Nora Hangel
  • Ruth Horn
  • Marjolein Lanzing
  • Sébastien Libert
  • Elisa Lievevrouw
  • Federica Lucivero
  • Luca Marelli
  • Barbara Prainsack
  • Franziska Schönweitz
  • Tamar Sharon
  • Wanda Spahl
  • Ine Van Hoyweghen
  • Bettina M. Zimmermann

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Wien
  • Technische Universität München (TUM)
  • Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS)
  • Université de Paris
  • University College Dublin
  • University of Oxford
  • Universität Augsburg
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA)
  • University College London (UCL)
  • KU Leuven
  • University of Milano-Bicocca
  • Radboud Universität Nijmegen (RU)
  • Universität Basel
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummermedhum-2022-012536
Seiten (von - bis)511-520
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftMedical Humanities
Jahrgang49
Ausgabenummer4
Frühes Online-Datum5 Juni 2023
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2023

Abstract

Calls for solidarity have been an ubiquitous feature in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we know little about how people have thought of and practised solidarity in their everyday lives since the beginning of the pandemic. What role does solidarity play in people's lives, how does it relate to COVID-19 public health measures and how has it changed in different phases of the pandemic? Situated within the medical humanities at the intersection of philosophy, bioethics, social sciences and policy studies, this article explores how the practice-based understanding of solidarity formulated by Prainsack and Buyx helps shed light on these questions. Drawing on 643 qualitative interviews carried out in two phases (April-May 2020 and October 2020) in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK), the data show that interpersonal acts of solidarity are important, but that they are not sustainable without consistent support at the institutional level. As the pandemic progressed, respondents expressed a longing for more institutionalised forms of solidarity. We argue that the medical humanities have much to gain from directing their attention to individual health issues, and to collective experiences of health or illness. The analysis of experiences through a collective lens such as solidarity offers unique insights to understandings of the individual and the collective. We propose three essential advances for research in the medical humanities that can help uncover collective experiences of disease and health crises: (1) an empirical and practice-oriented approach alongside more normative approaches; (2) the confidence to make recommendations for practice and policymaking and (3) the pursuit of cross-national and multidisciplinary research collaborations.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe. / Kieslich, Katharina; Fiske, Amelia; Gaille, Marie et al.
in: Medical Humanities, Jahrgang 49, Nr. 4, medhum-2022-012536, 12.2023, S. 511-520.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Kieslich, K, Fiske, A, Gaille, M, Galasso, I, Geiger, S, Hangel, N, Horn, R, Lanzing, M, Libert, S, Lievevrouw, E, Lucivero, F, Marelli, L, Prainsack, B, Schönweitz, F, Sharon, T, Spahl, W, Van Hoyweghen, I & Zimmermann, BM 2023, 'Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe', Medical Humanities, Jg. 49, Nr. 4, medhum-2022-012536, S. 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012536
Kieslich, K., Fiske, A., Gaille, M., Galasso, I., Geiger, S., Hangel, N., Horn, R., Lanzing, M., Libert, S., Lievevrouw, E., Lucivero, F., Marelli, L., Prainsack, B., Schönweitz, F., Sharon, T., Spahl, W., Van Hoyweghen, I., & Zimmermann, B. M. (2023). Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe. Medical Humanities, 49(4), 511-520. Artikel medhum-2022-012536. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012536
Kieslich K, Fiske A, Gaille M, Galasso I, Geiger S, Hangel N et al. Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe. Medical Humanities. 2023 Dez;49(4):511-520. medhum-2022-012536. Epub 2023 Jun 5. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012536
Kieslich, Katharina ; Fiske, Amelia ; Gaille, Marie et al. / Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe. in: Medical Humanities. 2023 ; Jahrgang 49, Nr. 4. S. 511-520.
Download
@article{25b0117785024e6696f76ccf13dc3b1f,
title = "Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe",
abstract = "Calls for solidarity have been an ubiquitous feature in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we know little about how people have thought of and practised solidarity in their everyday lives since the beginning of the pandemic. What role does solidarity play in people's lives, how does it relate to COVID-19 public health measures and how has it changed in different phases of the pandemic? Situated within the medical humanities at the intersection of philosophy, bioethics, social sciences and policy studies, this article explores how the practice-based understanding of solidarity formulated by Prainsack and Buyx helps shed light on these questions. Drawing on 643 qualitative interviews carried out in two phases (April-May 2020 and October 2020) in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK), the data show that interpersonal acts of solidarity are important, but that they are not sustainable without consistent support at the institutional level. As the pandemic progressed, respondents expressed a longing for more institutionalised forms of solidarity. We argue that the medical humanities have much to gain from directing their attention to individual health issues, and to collective experiences of health or illness. The analysis of experiences through a collective lens such as solidarity offers unique insights to understandings of the individual and the collective. We propose three essential advances for research in the medical humanities that can help uncover collective experiences of disease and health crises: (1) an empirical and practice-oriented approach alongside more normative approaches; (2) the confidence to make recommendations for practice and policymaking and (3) the pursuit of cross-national and multidisciplinary research collaborations.",
keywords = "COVID-19, health policy, medical ethics/bioethics, medical humanities, public health",
author = "Katharina Kieslich and Amelia Fiske and Marie Gaille and Ilaria Galasso and Susi Geiger and Nora Hangel and Ruth Horn and Marjolein Lanzing and S{\'e}bastien Libert and Elisa Lievevrouw and Federica Lucivero and Luca Marelli and Barbara Prainsack and Franziska Sch{\"o}nweitz and Tamar Sharon and Wanda Spahl and {Van Hoyweghen}, Ine and Zimmermann, {Bettina M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2023",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1136/medhum-2022-012536",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "511--520",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe

AU - Kieslich, Katharina

AU - Fiske, Amelia

AU - Gaille, Marie

AU - Galasso, Ilaria

AU - Geiger, Susi

AU - Hangel, Nora

AU - Horn, Ruth

AU - Lanzing, Marjolein

AU - Libert, Sébastien

AU - Lievevrouw, Elisa

AU - Lucivero, Federica

AU - Marelli, Luca

AU - Prainsack, Barbara

AU - Schönweitz, Franziska

AU - Sharon, Tamar

AU - Spahl, Wanda

AU - Van Hoyweghen, Ine

AU - Zimmermann, Bettina M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - Calls for solidarity have been an ubiquitous feature in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we know little about how people have thought of and practised solidarity in their everyday lives since the beginning of the pandemic. What role does solidarity play in people's lives, how does it relate to COVID-19 public health measures and how has it changed in different phases of the pandemic? Situated within the medical humanities at the intersection of philosophy, bioethics, social sciences and policy studies, this article explores how the practice-based understanding of solidarity formulated by Prainsack and Buyx helps shed light on these questions. Drawing on 643 qualitative interviews carried out in two phases (April-May 2020 and October 2020) in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK), the data show that interpersonal acts of solidarity are important, but that they are not sustainable without consistent support at the institutional level. As the pandemic progressed, respondents expressed a longing for more institutionalised forms of solidarity. We argue that the medical humanities have much to gain from directing their attention to individual health issues, and to collective experiences of health or illness. The analysis of experiences through a collective lens such as solidarity offers unique insights to understandings of the individual and the collective. We propose three essential advances for research in the medical humanities that can help uncover collective experiences of disease and health crises: (1) an empirical and practice-oriented approach alongside more normative approaches; (2) the confidence to make recommendations for practice and policymaking and (3) the pursuit of cross-national and multidisciplinary research collaborations.

AB - Calls for solidarity have been an ubiquitous feature in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we know little about how people have thought of and practised solidarity in their everyday lives since the beginning of the pandemic. What role does solidarity play in people's lives, how does it relate to COVID-19 public health measures and how has it changed in different phases of the pandemic? Situated within the medical humanities at the intersection of philosophy, bioethics, social sciences and policy studies, this article explores how the practice-based understanding of solidarity formulated by Prainsack and Buyx helps shed light on these questions. Drawing on 643 qualitative interviews carried out in two phases (April-May 2020 and October 2020) in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK), the data show that interpersonal acts of solidarity are important, but that they are not sustainable without consistent support at the institutional level. As the pandemic progressed, respondents expressed a longing for more institutionalised forms of solidarity. We argue that the medical humanities have much to gain from directing their attention to individual health issues, and to collective experiences of health or illness. The analysis of experiences through a collective lens such as solidarity offers unique insights to understandings of the individual and the collective. We propose three essential advances for research in the medical humanities that can help uncover collective experiences of disease and health crises: (1) an empirical and practice-oriented approach alongside more normative approaches; (2) the confidence to make recommendations for practice and policymaking and (3) the pursuit of cross-national and multidisciplinary research collaborations.

KW - COVID-19

KW - health policy

KW - medical ethics/bioethics

KW - medical humanities

KW - public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164435847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medhum-2022-012536

DO - 10.1136/medhum-2022-012536

M3 - Article

C2 - 37277183

AN - SCOPUS:85164435847

VL - 49

SP - 511

EP - 520

JO - Medical Humanities

JF - Medical Humanities

SN - 1468-215X

IS - 4

M1 - medhum-2022-012536

ER -