Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents’ behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Nora Hangel
  • Franziska Schönweitz
  • Stuart McLennan
  • Amelia Fiske
  • Bettina M. Zimmermann
  • Alena Buyx

Externe Organisationen

  • Technische Universität München (TUM)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer100051
FachzeitschriftSSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Jahrgang2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2022
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Politicians, policymakers, and mass media alike have emphasized the importance of solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic, calling for the need of social cohesion in society to protect risk groups and national healthcare systems. In this study, which is part of an international Consortium, we analyzed 77 qualitative interviews with members of the general public in Germany and German-speaking areas of Switzerland on solidaristic behavior and its limits during the first COVID-19 related lockdown in April 2020. We found interdependencies between the interpersonal, group, and state tiers of solidarity that offer insights into what promotes solidaristic practice and what does not. We argue that because solidarity does not have a necessary and sufficient normative value in itself, those wanting to promote solidarity need to consider these interdependencies to effectively implement policy measures. Our study shows that inter-societal solidarity was based on individual voluntary agency and promoted through recognizing a shared goal, shared values, or other communalities including group effort. It also shows that individuals held state authorities accountable for the same values and expect inter-societal reciprocity from the contractual level. Tensions between those complying or willing to follow recommendations voluntarily and those perceived as not promoting the shared goal, posed challenges for solidarity. Another challenge for solidaristic behavior was when acting in solidarity with others was in direct conflict with the needs of close ones. Our study provides a clearer picture of promoting and limiting factors concerning solidarity which is relevant when communicating health policy measures to individuals and groups.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents’ behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. / Hangel, Nora; Schönweitz, Franziska; McLennan, Stuart et al.
in: SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, Jahrgang 2, 100051, 01.12.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Hangel, N., Schönweitz, F., McLennan, S., Fiske, A., Zimmermann, B. M., & Buyx, A. (2022). Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents’ behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, Artikel 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100051
Hangel N, Schönweitz F, McLennan S, Fiske A, Zimmermann BM, Buyx A. Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents’ behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health. 2022 Dez 1;2:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100051
Hangel, Nora ; Schönweitz, Franziska ; McLennan, Stuart et al. / Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents’ behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. in: SSM - Qualitative Research in Health. 2022 ; Jahrgang 2.
Download
@article{11151fa8e3394c229454549e7baa0ceb,
title = "Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents{\textquoteright} behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020",
abstract = "Politicians, policymakers, and mass media alike have emphasized the importance of solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic, calling for the need of social cohesion in society to protect risk groups and national healthcare systems. In this study, which is part of an international Consortium, we analyzed 77 qualitative interviews with members of the general public in Germany and German-speaking areas of Switzerland on solidaristic behavior and its limits during the first COVID-19 related lockdown in April 2020. We found interdependencies between the interpersonal, group, and state tiers of solidarity that offer insights into what promotes solidaristic practice and what does not. We argue that because solidarity does not have a necessary and sufficient normative value in itself, those wanting to promote solidarity need to consider these interdependencies to effectively implement policy measures. Our study shows that inter-societal solidarity was based on individual voluntary agency and promoted through recognizing a shared goal, shared values, or other communalities including group effort. It also shows that individuals held state authorities accountable for the same values and expect inter-societal reciprocity from the contractual level. Tensions between those complying or willing to follow recommendations voluntarily and those perceived as not promoting the shared goal, posed challenges for solidarity. Another challenge for solidaristic behavior was when acting in solidarity with others was in direct conflict with the needs of close ones. Our study provides a clearer picture of promoting and limiting factors concerning solidarity which is relevant when communicating health policy measures to individuals and groups.",
keywords = "COVID-19, Distributive justice, Health policy, Qualitative methods, Social cohesion, Solidarity, Well-being",
author = "Nora Hangel and Franziska Sch{\"o}nweitz and Stuart McLennan and Amelia Fiske and Zimmermann, {Bettina M.} and Alena Buyx",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100051",
language = "English",
volume = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents’ behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020

AU - Hangel, Nora

AU - Schönweitz, Franziska

AU - McLennan, Stuart

AU - Fiske, Amelia

AU - Zimmermann, Bettina M.

AU - Buyx, Alena

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - Politicians, policymakers, and mass media alike have emphasized the importance of solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic, calling for the need of social cohesion in society to protect risk groups and national healthcare systems. In this study, which is part of an international Consortium, we analyzed 77 qualitative interviews with members of the general public in Germany and German-speaking areas of Switzerland on solidaristic behavior and its limits during the first COVID-19 related lockdown in April 2020. We found interdependencies between the interpersonal, group, and state tiers of solidarity that offer insights into what promotes solidaristic practice and what does not. We argue that because solidarity does not have a necessary and sufficient normative value in itself, those wanting to promote solidarity need to consider these interdependencies to effectively implement policy measures. Our study shows that inter-societal solidarity was based on individual voluntary agency and promoted through recognizing a shared goal, shared values, or other communalities including group effort. It also shows that individuals held state authorities accountable for the same values and expect inter-societal reciprocity from the contractual level. Tensions between those complying or willing to follow recommendations voluntarily and those perceived as not promoting the shared goal, posed challenges for solidarity. Another challenge for solidaristic behavior was when acting in solidarity with others was in direct conflict with the needs of close ones. Our study provides a clearer picture of promoting and limiting factors concerning solidarity which is relevant when communicating health policy measures to individuals and groups.

AB - Politicians, policymakers, and mass media alike have emphasized the importance of solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic, calling for the need of social cohesion in society to protect risk groups and national healthcare systems. In this study, which is part of an international Consortium, we analyzed 77 qualitative interviews with members of the general public in Germany and German-speaking areas of Switzerland on solidaristic behavior and its limits during the first COVID-19 related lockdown in April 2020. We found interdependencies between the interpersonal, group, and state tiers of solidarity that offer insights into what promotes solidaristic practice and what does not. We argue that because solidarity does not have a necessary and sufficient normative value in itself, those wanting to promote solidarity need to consider these interdependencies to effectively implement policy measures. Our study shows that inter-societal solidarity was based on individual voluntary agency and promoted through recognizing a shared goal, shared values, or other communalities including group effort. It also shows that individuals held state authorities accountable for the same values and expect inter-societal reciprocity from the contractual level. Tensions between those complying or willing to follow recommendations voluntarily and those perceived as not promoting the shared goal, posed challenges for solidarity. Another challenge for solidaristic behavior was when acting in solidarity with others was in direct conflict with the needs of close ones. Our study provides a clearer picture of promoting and limiting factors concerning solidarity which is relevant when communicating health policy measures to individuals and groups.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Distributive justice

KW - Health policy

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Social cohesion

KW - Solidarity

KW - Well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130981414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100051

DO - 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100051

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - SSM - Qualitative Research in Health

JF - SSM - Qualitative Research in Health

SN - 2667-3215

M1 - 100051

ER -