Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Conrad Wiermann
  • Malin Hanne Bockwoldt
  • Daniel Uteau
  • Stephan Peth
  • Anneka Mordhorst
  • Heiner Fleige

Externe Organisationen

  • Fachhochschule Kiel
  • Landwirtschaftskammer Schleswig-Holstein
  • Universität Kassel
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer106681
FachzeitschriftSoil and Tillage Research
Jahrgang253
Frühes Online-Datum3 Juni 2025
PublikationsstatusElektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 3 Juni 2025

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to analyse soil structure of representative crop (45 sites) and grassland (58 sites) soils and furthermore to identify differences in soil structure features between these sites in Northern Germany. Using the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT), published by Zink et al. (2011), the present state of soil structure was investigated. Additionally, the orientation of the pore system was analysed by combining the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Finally, the influence of soil structure features on crop yield of different arable plants was determined according to the concept of the Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (Müller et al., 2013). While (sub-) soil compaction within the transition layer, connecting top- and subsoil, was identified on 15 % of the on arable sites, on grassland sites in contrast only a negligible small proportion showed these features. Regarding the correlation of soil quality and crop yield, the results also show differences between arable and grassland sites: on arable soils a correlation was found with a coefficient of determination of nearly 50 % (R²=0.46), on grassland sites in contrast this correlation could not be identified. The conclusions of this study are the overriding importance of soil structure on arable soils regarding plant yield and management efficiency. In contrast, plant growth and yield on grassland soils are more likely determined by management practices (e.g. fertilisation, number of cuts) and the influencing groundwater than by soil structure features. Furthermore, the results show investigation methods should be adapted to grassland soils in order to analyse the complex interactions of soil, sward (including the dense rooting system) and environmental conditions.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany. / Wiermann, Conrad; Bockwoldt, Malin Hanne; Uteau, Daniel et al.
in: Soil and Tillage Research, Jahrgang 253, 106681, 11.2025.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Wiermann, C., Bockwoldt, M. H., Uteau, D., Peth, S., Mordhorst, A., & Fleige, H. (2025). Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany. Soil and Tillage Research, 253, Artikel 106681. Vorabveröffentlichung online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106681
Wiermann C, Bockwoldt MH, Uteau D, Peth S, Mordhorst A, Fleige H. Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany. Soil and Tillage Research. 2025 Nov;253:106681. Epub 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2025.106681
Wiermann, Conrad ; Bockwoldt, Malin Hanne ; Uteau, Daniel et al. / Present state of soil structure : A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany. in: Soil and Tillage Research. 2025 ; Jahrgang 253.
Download
@article{904ba4cca676405b84c4447a37607f8a,
title = "Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany",
abstract = "The objectives of this study are to analyse soil structure of representative crop (45 sites) and grassland (58 sites) soils and furthermore to identify differences in soil structure features between these sites in Northern Germany. Using the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT), published by Zink et al. (2011), the present state of soil structure was investigated. Additionally, the orientation of the pore system was analysed by combining the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Finally, the influence of soil structure features on crop yield of different arable plants was determined according to the concept of the Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (M{\"u}ller et al., 2013). While (sub-) soil compaction within the transition layer, connecting top- and subsoil, was identified on 15 % of the on arable sites, on grassland sites in contrast only a negligible small proportion showed these features. Regarding the correlation of soil quality and crop yield, the results also show differences between arable and grassland sites: on arable soils a correlation was found with a coefficient of determination of nearly 50 % (R²=0.46), on grassland sites in contrast this correlation could not be identified. The conclusions of this study are the overriding importance of soil structure on arable soils regarding plant yield and management efficiency. In contrast, plant growth and yield on grassland soils are more likely determined by management practices (e.g. fertilisation, number of cuts) and the influencing groundwater than by soil structure features. Furthermore, the results show investigation methods should be adapted to grassland soils in order to analyse the complex interactions of soil, sward (including the dense rooting system) and environmental conditions.",
keywords = "Compaction verification tool (CVT), Isotropic analysis, Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (MSQR), Soil compaction, Soil structure",
author = "Conrad Wiermann and Bockwoldt, {Malin Hanne} and Daniel Uteau and Stephan Peth and Anneka Mordhorst and Heiner Fleige",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2025",
month = jun,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.still.2025.106681",
language = "English",
volume = "253",
journal = "Soil and Tillage Research",
issn = "0167-1987",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Present state of soil structure

T2 - A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany

AU - Wiermann, Conrad

AU - Bockwoldt, Malin Hanne

AU - Uteau, Daniel

AU - Peth, Stephan

AU - Mordhorst, Anneka

AU - Fleige, Heiner

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2025/6/3

Y1 - 2025/6/3

N2 - The objectives of this study are to analyse soil structure of representative crop (45 sites) and grassland (58 sites) soils and furthermore to identify differences in soil structure features between these sites in Northern Germany. Using the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT), published by Zink et al. (2011), the present state of soil structure was investigated. Additionally, the orientation of the pore system was analysed by combining the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Finally, the influence of soil structure features on crop yield of different arable plants was determined according to the concept of the Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (Müller et al., 2013). While (sub-) soil compaction within the transition layer, connecting top- and subsoil, was identified on 15 % of the on arable sites, on grassland sites in contrast only a negligible small proportion showed these features. Regarding the correlation of soil quality and crop yield, the results also show differences between arable and grassland sites: on arable soils a correlation was found with a coefficient of determination of nearly 50 % (R²=0.46), on grassland sites in contrast this correlation could not be identified. The conclusions of this study are the overriding importance of soil structure on arable soils regarding plant yield and management efficiency. In contrast, plant growth and yield on grassland soils are more likely determined by management practices (e.g. fertilisation, number of cuts) and the influencing groundwater than by soil structure features. Furthermore, the results show investigation methods should be adapted to grassland soils in order to analyse the complex interactions of soil, sward (including the dense rooting system) and environmental conditions.

AB - The objectives of this study are to analyse soil structure of representative crop (45 sites) and grassland (58 sites) soils and furthermore to identify differences in soil structure features between these sites in Northern Germany. Using the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT), published by Zink et al. (2011), the present state of soil structure was investigated. Additionally, the orientation of the pore system was analysed by combining the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Finally, the influence of soil structure features on crop yield of different arable plants was determined according to the concept of the Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (Müller et al., 2013). While (sub-) soil compaction within the transition layer, connecting top- and subsoil, was identified on 15 % of the on arable sites, on grassland sites in contrast only a negligible small proportion showed these features. Regarding the correlation of soil quality and crop yield, the results also show differences between arable and grassland sites: on arable soils a correlation was found with a coefficient of determination of nearly 50 % (R²=0.46), on grassland sites in contrast this correlation could not be identified. The conclusions of this study are the overriding importance of soil structure on arable soils regarding plant yield and management efficiency. In contrast, plant growth and yield on grassland soils are more likely determined by management practices (e.g. fertilisation, number of cuts) and the influencing groundwater than by soil structure features. Furthermore, the results show investigation methods should be adapted to grassland soils in order to analyse the complex interactions of soil, sward (including the dense rooting system) and environmental conditions.

KW - Compaction verification tool (CVT)

KW - Isotropic analysis

KW - Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (MSQR)

KW - Soil compaction

KW - Soil structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007010024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.still.2025.106681

DO - 10.1016/j.still.2025.106681

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105007010024

VL - 253

JO - Soil and Tillage Research

JF - Soil and Tillage Research

SN - 0167-1987

M1 - 106681

ER -

Von denselben Autoren