Optimizing exposure duration and material selection for Passive Samplers for an improved wastewater surveillance of faecal pollution

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften – Hochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbüttel
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer128940
FachzeitschriftJournal of Environmental Management
Jahrgang401
Frühes Online-Datum11 Feb. 2026
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 März 2026

Abstract

The efficacy of Passive Samplers in providing near real-time data on the public health status during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been demonstrated. Though they are not fully developed or tested for the detection of bacteria and resistant genes. Our main objective was to analyse the applicability of different Passive Sampler (Polythene Stripe, Steel Wool Sponge, Glass Beads, Torpedo, Pensive, Q-Tip, Filter Membranes) for selected microbial parameters (Total Bacteria, Enterococci, Tetracycline A, and Class-1 Integron) and the identification of their optimal exposure duration (2 h to 48 h). DNA gene copies were analysed using a ddPCR. A new normalization approach is presented, allowing the direct comparison of sediment and biofilm Passive Samples to Wastewater Samples. With all Passive Samplers we were able to detect bacteria and resistant genes at all exposure durations. The results indicate: (1) Passive Samples yield reasonable normalized ratios of microbial parameters compared to composite Wastewater Samples; (2) Different Passive Sampler types (biofilm, sediment, material) have different optimal exposure durations; (3) The handling effort and reproducibility of the sediment extraction is best for Glass Beads. With our study we have demonstrated, that Passive Samplers can be an important tool in WBE applications.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Optimizing exposure duration and material selection for Passive Samplers for an improved wastewater surveillance of faecal pollution. / Look, Julius; Düker, Urda; Nogueira, Regina et al.
in: Journal of Environmental Management, Jahrgang 401, 128940, 01.03.2026.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Look J, Düker U, Nogueira R, Klawonn F, Wallner M. Optimizing exposure duration and material selection for Passive Samplers for an improved wastewater surveillance of faecal pollution. Journal of Environmental Management. 2026 Mär 1;401:128940. Epub 2026 Feb 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128940
Download
@article{d04d61d1600a444c80a362e25cb63f36,
title = "Optimizing exposure duration and material selection for Passive Samplers for an improved wastewater surveillance of faecal pollution",
abstract = "The efficacy of Passive Samplers in providing near real-time data on the public health status during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been demonstrated. Though they are not fully developed or tested for the detection of bacteria and resistant genes. Our main objective was to analyse the applicability of different Passive Sampler (Polythene Stripe, Steel Wool Sponge, Glass Beads, Torpedo, Pensive, Q-Tip, Filter Membranes) for selected microbial parameters (Total Bacteria, Enterococci, Tetracycline A, and Class-1 Integron) and the identification of their optimal exposure duration (2 h to 48 h). DNA gene copies were analysed using a ddPCR. A new normalization approach is presented, allowing the direct comparison of sediment and biofilm Passive Samples to Wastewater Samples. With all Passive Samplers we were able to detect bacteria and resistant genes at all exposure durations. The results indicate: (1) Passive Samples yield reasonable normalized ratios of microbial parameters compared to composite Wastewater Samples; (2) Different Passive Sampler types (biofilm, sediment, material) have different optimal exposure durations; (3) The handling effort and reproducibility of the sediment extraction is best for Glass Beads. With our study we have demonstrated, that Passive Samplers can be an important tool in WBE applications.",
keywords = "Antibiotic resistant genes, Bacteria, Passive samplers, Wastewater based epidemiology, Wastewater monitoring",
author = "Julius Look and Urda D{\"u}ker and Regina Nogueira and Frank Klawonn and Markus Wallner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2026 The Authors",
year = "2026",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128940",
language = "English",
volume = "401",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing exposure duration and material selection for Passive Samplers for an improved wastewater surveillance of faecal pollution

AU - Look, Julius

AU - Düker, Urda

AU - Nogueira, Regina

AU - Klawonn, Frank

AU - Wallner, Markus

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2026 The Authors

PY - 2026/3/1

Y1 - 2026/3/1

N2 - The efficacy of Passive Samplers in providing near real-time data on the public health status during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been demonstrated. Though they are not fully developed or tested for the detection of bacteria and resistant genes. Our main objective was to analyse the applicability of different Passive Sampler (Polythene Stripe, Steel Wool Sponge, Glass Beads, Torpedo, Pensive, Q-Tip, Filter Membranes) for selected microbial parameters (Total Bacteria, Enterococci, Tetracycline A, and Class-1 Integron) and the identification of their optimal exposure duration (2 h to 48 h). DNA gene copies were analysed using a ddPCR. A new normalization approach is presented, allowing the direct comparison of sediment and biofilm Passive Samples to Wastewater Samples. With all Passive Samplers we were able to detect bacteria and resistant genes at all exposure durations. The results indicate: (1) Passive Samples yield reasonable normalized ratios of microbial parameters compared to composite Wastewater Samples; (2) Different Passive Sampler types (biofilm, sediment, material) have different optimal exposure durations; (3) The handling effort and reproducibility of the sediment extraction is best for Glass Beads. With our study we have demonstrated, that Passive Samplers can be an important tool in WBE applications.

AB - The efficacy of Passive Samplers in providing near real-time data on the public health status during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been demonstrated. Though they are not fully developed or tested for the detection of bacteria and resistant genes. Our main objective was to analyse the applicability of different Passive Sampler (Polythene Stripe, Steel Wool Sponge, Glass Beads, Torpedo, Pensive, Q-Tip, Filter Membranes) for selected microbial parameters (Total Bacteria, Enterococci, Tetracycline A, and Class-1 Integron) and the identification of their optimal exposure duration (2 h to 48 h). DNA gene copies were analysed using a ddPCR. A new normalization approach is presented, allowing the direct comparison of sediment and biofilm Passive Samples to Wastewater Samples. With all Passive Samplers we were able to detect bacteria and resistant genes at all exposure durations. The results indicate: (1) Passive Samples yield reasonable normalized ratios of microbial parameters compared to composite Wastewater Samples; (2) Different Passive Sampler types (biofilm, sediment, material) have different optimal exposure durations; (3) The handling effort and reproducibility of the sediment extraction is best for Glass Beads. With our study we have demonstrated, that Passive Samplers can be an important tool in WBE applications.

KW - Antibiotic resistant genes

KW - Bacteria

KW - Passive samplers

KW - Wastewater based epidemiology

KW - Wastewater monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105029869809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128940

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128940

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105029869809

VL - 401

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

M1 - 128940

ER -