Narratives underlying research in African river basin management

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • ETH Zürich
  • Universität Osnabrück
  • Addis Ababa University
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1859-1874
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftSustainability science
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer6
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2021
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

River modifications through hydropower dams and other infrastructure have far-reaching economic, ecological and social effects that are viewed in highly contrasting ways depending on underlying narratives. As part of a Euro-African research consortium funded by the European Commission we studied pathways for sustainable river basin management in the Omo-Turkana basins in Ethiopia and Kenya. Based on a literature review, stakeholder workshops, targeted interviews and considering our own positionality, we identified underlying narratives related to (a) economic transformation and modernization, (b) indigenous rights and (c) nature conservation, which were all connected through water, energy, food and ecosystems within a (d) landscape nexus. Yet, we also identified a (e) living museum narrative suggesting that international advocacy for indigenous rights and nature conservation is a means through which Western societies want to preserve African societies in an “undeveloped” state. National governments use this narrative to silence external critique, while the tourism industry promotes it to advertise visits to pastoralist tribes. This narrative reveals powerful, yet largely ignored hindrances for collaborative projects resulting from cultural and historical biases in Euro-African collaborations. Based on our analysis, we argue that international research projects in sustainability sciences need to increase the transparency of open and hidden narratives that influence research directions and power relationships between scientific partners, also those using mostly technically-driven approaches. We emphasize that African landscapes are not to be viewed as living museums, and collaborative research should be based on fairness, respect, care, and honesty to allow for multiple narratives that underlie research.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Narratives underlying research in African river basin management. / Kleinschroth, Fritz; Lumosi, Caroline; Bantider, Amare et al.
in: Sustainability science, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 6, 11.2021, S. 1859-1874.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Kleinschroth F, Lumosi C, Bantider A, Anteneh Y, van Bers C. Narratives underlying research in African river basin management. Sustainability science. 2021 Nov;16(6):1859-1874. doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-01044-4
Kleinschroth, Fritz ; Lumosi, Caroline ; Bantider, Amare et al. / Narratives underlying research in African river basin management. in: Sustainability science. 2021 ; Jahrgang 16, Nr. 6. S. 1859-1874.
Download
@article{f9cb251db82649619250d5ba01c9e8df,
title = "Narratives underlying research in African river basin management",
abstract = "River modifications through hydropower dams and other infrastructure have far-reaching economic, ecological and social effects that are viewed in highly contrasting ways depending on underlying narratives. As part of a Euro-African research consortium funded by the European Commission we studied pathways for sustainable river basin management in the Omo-Turkana basins in Ethiopia and Kenya. Based on a literature review, stakeholder workshops, targeted interviews and considering our own positionality, we identified underlying narratives related to (a) economic transformation and modernization, (b) indigenous rights and (c) nature conservation, which were all connected through water, energy, food and ecosystems within a (d) landscape nexus. Yet, we also identified a (e) living museum narrative suggesting that international advocacy for indigenous rights and nature conservation is a means through which Western societies want to preserve African societies in an “undeveloped” state. National governments use this narrative to silence external critique, while the tourism industry promotes it to advertise visits to pastoralist tribes. This narrative reveals powerful, yet largely ignored hindrances for collaborative projects resulting from cultural and historical biases in Euro-African collaborations. Based on our analysis, we argue that international research projects in sustainability sciences need to increase the transparency of open and hidden narratives that influence research directions and power relationships between scientific partners, also those using mostly technically-driven approaches. We emphasize that African landscapes are not to be viewed as living museums, and collaborative research should be based on fairness, respect, care, and honesty to allow for multiple narratives that underlie research.",
keywords = "Landscape approach, Positionality, Scientific collaboration, Sustainable development, Water-energy-food nexus, Watersheds",
author = "Fritz Kleinschroth and Caroline Lumosi and Amare Bantider and Yilikal Anteneh and {van Bers}, Caroline",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11625-021-01044-4",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1859--1874",
journal = "Sustainability science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narratives underlying research in African river basin management

AU - Kleinschroth, Fritz

AU - Lumosi, Caroline

AU - Bantider, Amare

AU - Anteneh, Yilikal

AU - van Bers, Caroline

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - River modifications through hydropower dams and other infrastructure have far-reaching economic, ecological and social effects that are viewed in highly contrasting ways depending on underlying narratives. As part of a Euro-African research consortium funded by the European Commission we studied pathways for sustainable river basin management in the Omo-Turkana basins in Ethiopia and Kenya. Based on a literature review, stakeholder workshops, targeted interviews and considering our own positionality, we identified underlying narratives related to (a) economic transformation and modernization, (b) indigenous rights and (c) nature conservation, which were all connected through water, energy, food and ecosystems within a (d) landscape nexus. Yet, we also identified a (e) living museum narrative suggesting that international advocacy for indigenous rights and nature conservation is a means through which Western societies want to preserve African societies in an “undeveloped” state. National governments use this narrative to silence external critique, while the tourism industry promotes it to advertise visits to pastoralist tribes. This narrative reveals powerful, yet largely ignored hindrances for collaborative projects resulting from cultural and historical biases in Euro-African collaborations. Based on our analysis, we argue that international research projects in sustainability sciences need to increase the transparency of open and hidden narratives that influence research directions and power relationships between scientific partners, also those using mostly technically-driven approaches. We emphasize that African landscapes are not to be viewed as living museums, and collaborative research should be based on fairness, respect, care, and honesty to allow for multiple narratives that underlie research.

AB - River modifications through hydropower dams and other infrastructure have far-reaching economic, ecological and social effects that are viewed in highly contrasting ways depending on underlying narratives. As part of a Euro-African research consortium funded by the European Commission we studied pathways for sustainable river basin management in the Omo-Turkana basins in Ethiopia and Kenya. Based on a literature review, stakeholder workshops, targeted interviews and considering our own positionality, we identified underlying narratives related to (a) economic transformation and modernization, (b) indigenous rights and (c) nature conservation, which were all connected through water, energy, food and ecosystems within a (d) landscape nexus. Yet, we also identified a (e) living museum narrative suggesting that international advocacy for indigenous rights and nature conservation is a means through which Western societies want to preserve African societies in an “undeveloped” state. National governments use this narrative to silence external critique, while the tourism industry promotes it to advertise visits to pastoralist tribes. This narrative reveals powerful, yet largely ignored hindrances for collaborative projects resulting from cultural and historical biases in Euro-African collaborations. Based on our analysis, we argue that international research projects in sustainability sciences need to increase the transparency of open and hidden narratives that influence research directions and power relationships between scientific partners, also those using mostly technically-driven approaches. We emphasize that African landscapes are not to be viewed as living museums, and collaborative research should be based on fairness, respect, care, and honesty to allow for multiple narratives that underlie research.

KW - Landscape approach

KW - Positionality

KW - Scientific collaboration

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Water-energy-food nexus

KW - Watersheds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116424869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-021-01044-4

DO - 10.1007/s11625-021-01044-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85116424869

VL - 16

SP - 1859

EP - 1874

JO - Sustainability science

JF - Sustainability science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - 6

ER -

Von denselben Autoren