Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer101502
Seitenumfang14
FachzeitschriftEnergy strategy reviews
Jahrgang55
Frühes Online-Datum22 Aug. 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Sept. 2024

Abstract

In densely populated countries, land competition is a key challenge in light of a growing population and the land-intensive decarbonization of energy supply. We apply an energy system model using linear optimization to Germany as an example for a densely populated and industrialized nation with a high energy demand to show how land competition affects the economics of land-intensive renewable energies. Bioenergy crops are currently cultivated on 6.5% of Germany's land area. We find that allocating only 6% of the total land to the future energy system, which is even less than the current allocation to bioenergy crops, allows for a system that is close to the cost-minimum that we calculate when not restricting the land area. This 6% of the land area is divided into 4% for photovoltaics (PV), 2% for onshore wind and 0% for bioenergy crops. This would save 15 billion €/a (15.1%) relative to the system that matches current political targets for utility-scale PV. For areas exceeding this 6%, we find that the most cost-efficient utilization comes from bioenergy crops, but they only add value to the energy system if there is plenty of land available. The value of land to the energy system is at least twice as high for 0% remaining emissions when compared to the case of 10% remaining green house gas emissions, although both scenarios are separated by less than five years according to current German law. Both our findings underline that considering the value of land as early as possible is necessary when developing state policies that shall lead to cost-efficient renewable energy systems.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany. / Schlemminger, Marlon; Lohr, Clemens; Peterssen, Florian et al.
in: Energy strategy reviews, Jahrgang 55, 101502, 09.2024.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Schlemminger, M., Lohr, C., Peterssen, F., Bredemeier, D., Niepelt, R., Bensmann, A., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., Breitner, M. H., & Brendel, R. (2024). Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany. Energy strategy reviews, 55, Artikel 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101502
Schlemminger M, Lohr C, Peterssen F, Bredemeier D, Niepelt R, Bensmann A et al. Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany. Energy strategy reviews. 2024 Sep;55:101502. Epub 2024 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101502
Schlemminger, Marlon ; Lohr, Clemens ; Peterssen, Florian et al. / Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems : A case study for Germany. in: Energy strategy reviews. 2024 ; Jahrgang 55.
Download
@article{af6b9a3db4c2430c9f869e64fb7b17b5,
title = "Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany",
abstract = "In densely populated countries, land competition is a key challenge in light of a growing population and the land-intensive decarbonization of energy supply. We apply an energy system model using linear optimization to Germany as an example for a densely populated and industrialized nation with a high energy demand to show how land competition affects the economics of land-intensive renewable energies. Bioenergy crops are currently cultivated on 6.5% of Germany's land area. We find that allocating only 6% of the total land to the future energy system, which is even less than the current allocation to bioenergy crops, allows for a system that is close to the cost-minimum that we calculate when not restricting the land area. This 6% of the land area is divided into 4% for photovoltaics (PV), 2% for onshore wind and 0% for bioenergy crops. This would save 15 billion €/a (15.1%) relative to the system that matches current political targets for utility-scale PV. For areas exceeding this 6%, we find that the most cost-efficient utilization comes from bioenergy crops, but they only add value to the energy system if there is plenty of land available. The value of land to the energy system is at least twice as high for 0% remaining emissions when compared to the case of 10% remaining green house gas emissions, although both scenarios are separated by less than five years according to current German law. Both our findings underline that considering the value of land as early as possible is necessary when developing state policies that shall lead to cost-efficient renewable energy systems.",
keywords = "Bioenergy crops, Economics of renewable energies, Energy system analysis, Land competition, Solar energy",
author = "Marlon Schlemminger and Clemens Lohr and Florian Peterssen and Dennis Bredemeier and Raphael Niepelt and Astrid Bensmann and Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach and Breitner, {Michael H.} and Rolf Brendel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.esr.2024.101502",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
journal = "Energy strategy reviews",
issn = "2211-467X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems

T2 - A case study for Germany

AU - Schlemminger, Marlon

AU - Lohr, Clemens

AU - Peterssen, Florian

AU - Bredemeier, Dennis

AU - Niepelt, Raphael

AU - Bensmann, Astrid

AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard

AU - Breitner, Michael H.

AU - Brendel, Rolf

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024/9

Y1 - 2024/9

N2 - In densely populated countries, land competition is a key challenge in light of a growing population and the land-intensive decarbonization of energy supply. We apply an energy system model using linear optimization to Germany as an example for a densely populated and industrialized nation with a high energy demand to show how land competition affects the economics of land-intensive renewable energies. Bioenergy crops are currently cultivated on 6.5% of Germany's land area. We find that allocating only 6% of the total land to the future energy system, which is even less than the current allocation to bioenergy crops, allows for a system that is close to the cost-minimum that we calculate when not restricting the land area. This 6% of the land area is divided into 4% for photovoltaics (PV), 2% for onshore wind and 0% for bioenergy crops. This would save 15 billion €/a (15.1%) relative to the system that matches current political targets for utility-scale PV. For areas exceeding this 6%, we find that the most cost-efficient utilization comes from bioenergy crops, but they only add value to the energy system if there is plenty of land available. The value of land to the energy system is at least twice as high for 0% remaining emissions when compared to the case of 10% remaining green house gas emissions, although both scenarios are separated by less than five years according to current German law. Both our findings underline that considering the value of land as early as possible is necessary when developing state policies that shall lead to cost-efficient renewable energy systems.

AB - In densely populated countries, land competition is a key challenge in light of a growing population and the land-intensive decarbonization of energy supply. We apply an energy system model using linear optimization to Germany as an example for a densely populated and industrialized nation with a high energy demand to show how land competition affects the economics of land-intensive renewable energies. Bioenergy crops are currently cultivated on 6.5% of Germany's land area. We find that allocating only 6% of the total land to the future energy system, which is even less than the current allocation to bioenergy crops, allows for a system that is close to the cost-minimum that we calculate when not restricting the land area. This 6% of the land area is divided into 4% for photovoltaics (PV), 2% for onshore wind and 0% for bioenergy crops. This would save 15 billion €/a (15.1%) relative to the system that matches current political targets for utility-scale PV. For areas exceeding this 6%, we find that the most cost-efficient utilization comes from bioenergy crops, but they only add value to the energy system if there is plenty of land available. The value of land to the energy system is at least twice as high for 0% remaining emissions when compared to the case of 10% remaining green house gas emissions, although both scenarios are separated by less than five years according to current German law. Both our findings underline that considering the value of land as early as possible is necessary when developing state policies that shall lead to cost-efficient renewable energy systems.

KW - Bioenergy crops

KW - Economics of renewable energies

KW - Energy system analysis

KW - Land competition

KW - Solar energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201734084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101502

DO - 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101502

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85201734084

VL - 55

JO - Energy strategy reviews

JF - Energy strategy reviews

SN - 2211-467X

M1 - 101502

ER -

Von denselben Autoren