Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Blal Adem Esmail
  • Cyrus Carl Anderson
  • Sigvard Bast
  • Chiara Cortinovis
  • Lina Suleiman
  • Jarumi Kato-Huerta
  • Johan Högström
  • Berit Balfors
  • Gustavo Arciniegas
  • Davide Geneletti
  • Ulla Mörtberg
  • Christian Albert

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
  • Eurac Research
  • Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
  • Università degli Studi di Trento
  • Geo-Col GIS and Collaborative Planning
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)285-304
Seitenumfang20
FachzeitschriftAMBIO
Jahrgang54
Ausgabenummer2
Frühes Online-Datum19 Okt. 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2025

Abstract

Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions. / Adem Esmail, Blal; Anderson, Cyrus Carl; Bast, Sigvard et al.
in: AMBIO, Jahrgang 54, Nr. 2, 02.2025, S. 285-304.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Adem Esmail, B, Anderson, CC, Bast, S, Cortinovis, C, Suleiman, L, Kato-Huerta, J, Högström, J, Balfors, B, Arciniegas, G, Geneletti, D, Mörtberg, U & Albert, C 2025, 'Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions', AMBIO, Jg. 54, Nr. 2, S. 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
Adem Esmail, B., Anderson, C. C., Bast, S., Cortinovis, C., Suleiman, L., Kato-Huerta, J., Högström, J., Balfors, B., Arciniegas, G., Geneletti, D., Mörtberg, U., & Albert, C. (2025). Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions. AMBIO, 54(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
Adem Esmail B, Anderson CC, Bast S, Cortinovis C, Suleiman L, Kato-Huerta J et al. Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions. AMBIO. 2025 Feb;54(2):285-304. Epub 2024 Okt 19. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
Adem Esmail, Blal ; Anderson, Cyrus Carl ; Bast, Sigvard et al. / Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning : A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions. in: AMBIO. 2025 ; Jahrgang 54, Nr. 2. S. 285-304.
Download
@article{1850ef239d9543b382dff1a90857831c,
title = "Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions",
abstract = "Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing {\textquoteleft}boundaries{\textquoteright} between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to {\textquoteleft}boundary work{\textquoteright}. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpn{\"a}ck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs{\textquoteright} perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.",
keywords = "Boundary management, Impact assessment, Knowledge co-creation, Land use change, Scenario planning, Suitability analysis",
author = "{Adem Esmail}, Blal and Anderson, {Cyrus Carl} and Sigvard Bast and Chiara Cortinovis and Lina Suleiman and Jarumi Kato-Huerta and Johan H{\"o}gstr{\"o}m and Berit Balfors and Gustavo Arciniegas and Davide Geneletti and Ulla M{\"o}rtberg and Christian Albert",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "285--304",
journal = "AMBIO",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning

T2 - A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

AU - Adem Esmail, Blal

AU - Anderson, Cyrus Carl

AU - Bast, Sigvard

AU - Cortinovis, Chiara

AU - Suleiman, Lina

AU - Kato-Huerta, Jarumi

AU - Högström, Johan

AU - Balfors, Berit

AU - Arciniegas, Gustavo

AU - Geneletti, Davide

AU - Mörtberg, Ulla

AU - Albert, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

N2 - Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.

AB - Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.

KW - Boundary management

KW - Impact assessment

KW - Knowledge co-creation

KW - Land use change

KW - Scenario planning

KW - Suitability analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206988084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8

DO - 10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 39425860

AN - SCOPUS:85206988084

VL - 54

SP - 285

EP - 304

JO - AMBIO

JF - AMBIO

SN - 0044-7447

IS - 2

ER -

Von denselben Autoren