Beyond bloom: validated marker–trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer1591861
FachzeitschriftFrontiers in Plant Science
Jahrgang16
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 13 Mai 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Breeding roses with ideal ornamental characteristics such as beautiful flowers, a pleasant fragrance, and attractive growth habits is complex and time-consuming. This process can be improved and accelerated through the use of molecular markers. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study on nine ornamental traits in roses using the RhWagSNP chip across a panel of 285 cultivars and varieties. Significant marker-trait associations found for major quantitative trait loci were further validated using single-marker analyses with PACE technology in independent panels of up to 182 genotypes. Results: For six traits— ‘Young shoot: intensity of anthocyanin coloration’, ‘Stem: number of prickles’, ‘Leaf: glossiness of upper side’, ‘Flower: number of petals’, ‘Flower: fragrance’, and ‘Petal: length’—we identified and validated marker-trait associations for major QTLs. Conversely, we were unable to validate associations for ‘Leaf: anthocyanin coloration’ and ‘Leaf: intensity of green color on the upper side’, and found no significant associations in the GWAS for ‘Leaf: size’. Loci that affect petal size, petal number and fragrance have been previously studied. We were able to detect associated markers with increased effect sizes for all three traits. Even greater effects were observed when we combined markers from independent loci for petal number and fragrance. Discussion: Associated markers for some of the analysed traits largely colocalise with markers previously identified in QTL analyses of biparental populations. Our validation strategy using PACE as an alternative marker technology in independent panels and different environments supports the robustness of our data, irrespective of our limited panel sizes. For the six traits for which we could validate marker-trait associations, our data can be interpreted cautiously as indicating high complexity of inheritance, with few large-effect QTLs influencing the traits. For the other four traits, either greater genetic complexity and/or stronger environmental effects may have confounded our analyses. We believe that the markers presented here can serve as valuable tools for marker-assisted selection and for further genetic analysis of the traits we have analysed.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Beyond bloom: validated marker–trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS. / Patzer, Laurine; Schulz, Dietmar Frank; Ezeoke, Amarachi Queendaline et al.
in: Frontiers in Plant Science, Jahrgang 16, 1591861, 13.05.2025.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Patzer L, Schulz DF, Ezeoke AQ, Linde M, Debener T. Beyond bloom: validated marker–trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2025 Mai 13;16:1591861. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1591861
Patzer, Laurine ; Schulz, Dietmar Frank ; Ezeoke, Amarachi Queendaline et al. / Beyond bloom : validated marker–trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS. in: Frontiers in Plant Science. 2025 ; Jahrgang 16.
Download
@article{e5703f930e0544d09f3ccd4db9be2eab,
title = "Beyond bloom: validated marker–trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS",
abstract = "Introduction: Breeding roses with ideal ornamental characteristics such as beautiful flowers, a pleasant fragrance, and attractive growth habits is complex and time-consuming. This process can be improved and accelerated through the use of molecular markers. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study on nine ornamental traits in roses using the RhWagSNP chip across a panel of 285 cultivars and varieties. Significant marker-trait associations found for major quantitative trait loci were further validated using single-marker analyses with PACE technology in independent panels of up to 182 genotypes. Results: For six traits— {\textquoteleft}Young shoot: intensity of anthocyanin coloration{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}Stem: number of prickles{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}Leaf: glossiness of upper side{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}Flower: number of petals{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}Flower: fragrance{\textquoteright}, and {\textquoteleft}Petal: length{\textquoteright}—we identified and validated marker-trait associations for major QTLs. Conversely, we were unable to validate associations for {\textquoteleft}Leaf: anthocyanin coloration{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}Leaf: intensity of green color on the upper side{\textquoteright}, and found no significant associations in the GWAS for {\textquoteleft}Leaf: size{\textquoteright}. Loci that affect petal size, petal number and fragrance have been previously studied. We were able to detect associated markers with increased effect sizes for all three traits. Even greater effects were observed when we combined markers from independent loci for petal number and fragrance. Discussion: Associated markers for some of the analysed traits largely colocalise with markers previously identified in QTL analyses of biparental populations. Our validation strategy using PACE as an alternative marker technology in independent panels and different environments supports the robustness of our data, irrespective of our limited panel sizes. For the six traits for which we could validate marker-trait associations, our data can be interpreted cautiously as indicating high complexity of inheritance, with few large-effect QTLs influencing the traits. For the other four traits, either greater genetic complexity and/or stronger environmental effects may have confounded our analyses. We believe that the markers presented here can serve as valuable tools for marker-assisted selection and for further genetic analysis of the traits we have analysed.",
keywords = "breeding, genome-wide association studies, MAS, molecular markers, polyploid, QTL, rose ornamental traits, SNP array",
author = "Laurine Patzer and Schulz, {Dietmar Frank} and Ezeoke, {Amarachi Queendaline} and Marcus Linde and Thomas Debener",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2025 Patzer, Schulz, Ezeoke, Linde and Debener.",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "13",
doi = "10.3389/fpls.2025.1591861",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Frontiers in Plant Science",
issn = "1664-462X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond bloom

T2 - validated marker–trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS

AU - Patzer, Laurine

AU - Schulz, Dietmar Frank

AU - Ezeoke, Amarachi Queendaline

AU - Linde, Marcus

AU - Debener, Thomas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2025 Patzer, Schulz, Ezeoke, Linde and Debener.

PY - 2025/5/13

Y1 - 2025/5/13

N2 - Introduction: Breeding roses with ideal ornamental characteristics such as beautiful flowers, a pleasant fragrance, and attractive growth habits is complex and time-consuming. This process can be improved and accelerated through the use of molecular markers. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study on nine ornamental traits in roses using the RhWagSNP chip across a panel of 285 cultivars and varieties. Significant marker-trait associations found for major quantitative trait loci were further validated using single-marker analyses with PACE technology in independent panels of up to 182 genotypes. Results: For six traits— ‘Young shoot: intensity of anthocyanin coloration’, ‘Stem: number of prickles’, ‘Leaf: glossiness of upper side’, ‘Flower: number of petals’, ‘Flower: fragrance’, and ‘Petal: length’—we identified and validated marker-trait associations for major QTLs. Conversely, we were unable to validate associations for ‘Leaf: anthocyanin coloration’ and ‘Leaf: intensity of green color on the upper side’, and found no significant associations in the GWAS for ‘Leaf: size’. Loci that affect petal size, petal number and fragrance have been previously studied. We were able to detect associated markers with increased effect sizes for all three traits. Even greater effects were observed when we combined markers from independent loci for petal number and fragrance. Discussion: Associated markers for some of the analysed traits largely colocalise with markers previously identified in QTL analyses of biparental populations. Our validation strategy using PACE as an alternative marker technology in independent panels and different environments supports the robustness of our data, irrespective of our limited panel sizes. For the six traits for which we could validate marker-trait associations, our data can be interpreted cautiously as indicating high complexity of inheritance, with few large-effect QTLs influencing the traits. For the other four traits, either greater genetic complexity and/or stronger environmental effects may have confounded our analyses. We believe that the markers presented here can serve as valuable tools for marker-assisted selection and for further genetic analysis of the traits we have analysed.

AB - Introduction: Breeding roses with ideal ornamental characteristics such as beautiful flowers, a pleasant fragrance, and attractive growth habits is complex and time-consuming. This process can be improved and accelerated through the use of molecular markers. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study on nine ornamental traits in roses using the RhWagSNP chip across a panel of 285 cultivars and varieties. Significant marker-trait associations found for major quantitative trait loci were further validated using single-marker analyses with PACE technology in independent panels of up to 182 genotypes. Results: For six traits— ‘Young shoot: intensity of anthocyanin coloration’, ‘Stem: number of prickles’, ‘Leaf: glossiness of upper side’, ‘Flower: number of petals’, ‘Flower: fragrance’, and ‘Petal: length’—we identified and validated marker-trait associations for major QTLs. Conversely, we were unable to validate associations for ‘Leaf: anthocyanin coloration’ and ‘Leaf: intensity of green color on the upper side’, and found no significant associations in the GWAS for ‘Leaf: size’. Loci that affect petal size, petal number and fragrance have been previously studied. We were able to detect associated markers with increased effect sizes for all three traits. Even greater effects were observed when we combined markers from independent loci for petal number and fragrance. Discussion: Associated markers for some of the analysed traits largely colocalise with markers previously identified in QTL analyses of biparental populations. Our validation strategy using PACE as an alternative marker technology in independent panels and different environments supports the robustness of our data, irrespective of our limited panel sizes. For the six traits for which we could validate marker-trait associations, our data can be interpreted cautiously as indicating high complexity of inheritance, with few large-effect QTLs influencing the traits. For the other four traits, either greater genetic complexity and/or stronger environmental effects may have confounded our analyses. We believe that the markers presented here can serve as valuable tools for marker-assisted selection and for further genetic analysis of the traits we have analysed.

KW - breeding

KW - genome-wide association studies

KW - MAS

KW - molecular markers

KW - polyploid

KW - QTL

KW - rose ornamental traits

KW - SNP array

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006681007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2025.1591861

DO - 10.3389/fpls.2025.1591861

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105006681007

VL - 16

JO - Frontiers in Plant Science

JF - Frontiers in Plant Science

SN - 1664-462X

M1 - 1591861

ER -

Von denselben Autoren