Assessing seismic vulnerability of modular buildings under earthquake ground motions

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • The University of Liverpool
  • Tongji University
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer120002
Seitenumfang15
FachzeitschriftEngineering structures
Jahrgang331
Frühes Online-Datum3 März 2025
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Mai 2025

Abstract

In earthquake-prone regions like Iceland, where an average of 500 earthquakes occurs weekly, modular buildings constructed according to EU standards encounter significant seismic challenges. This study investigates the seismic performance of nonlinear modular building models under both near-field pulse-type ground motions and fully non-stationary non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions, generated through Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Latinized Partially Stratified Sampling (LPSS) methods. Key structural response parameters, including inter-story drift, base shear, and acceleration, are analyzed, with their probability distribution functions (PDFs) and fragility functions evaluated against industry-standard limit states, such as those defined by FEMA. Results reveal that pulse-type ground motions, characterized by large, high-velocity pulses, result in a higher probability of failure, especially in the width direction, compared to non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions. The top floor exhibits greater vulnerability under seismic forces, underscoring the need for focused structural reinforcement. The findings highlight the importance of considering both pulse-type and non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions in structural design practices and seismic codes to enhance the resilience and safety of modular buildings in earthquake-prone areas. This study contributes to the seismic engineering field by providing insights into the vulnerability and robustness of modular structures under diverse seismic loading conditions.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Assessing seismic vulnerability of modular buildings under earthquake ground motions. / Elias, S.; Beer, M.; Chen, J.
in: Engineering structures, Jahrgang 331, 120002, 15.05.2025.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Elias S, Beer M, Chen J. Assessing seismic vulnerability of modular buildings under earthquake ground motions. Engineering structures. 2025 Mai 15;331:120002. Epub 2025 Mär 3. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120002
Download
@article{32ba4abc8ded4fc19f92330b6dd48b16,
title = "Assessing seismic vulnerability of modular buildings under earthquake ground motions",
abstract = "In earthquake-prone regions like Iceland, where an average of 500 earthquakes occurs weekly, modular buildings constructed according to EU standards encounter significant seismic challenges. This study investigates the seismic performance of nonlinear modular building models under both near-field pulse-type ground motions and fully non-stationary non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions, generated through Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Latinized Partially Stratified Sampling (LPSS) methods. Key structural response parameters, including inter-story drift, base shear, and acceleration, are analyzed, with their probability distribution functions (PDFs) and fragility functions evaluated against industry-standard limit states, such as those defined by FEMA. Results reveal that pulse-type ground motions, characterized by large, high-velocity pulses, result in a higher probability of failure, especially in the width direction, compared to non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions. The top floor exhibits greater vulnerability under seismic forces, underscoring the need for focused structural reinforcement. The findings highlight the importance of considering both pulse-type and non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions in structural design practices and seismic codes to enhance the resilience and safety of modular buildings in earthquake-prone areas. This study contributes to the seismic engineering field by providing insights into the vulnerability and robustness of modular structures under diverse seismic loading conditions.",
keywords = "Near-field ground motions, Nonlinear modular buildings, Seismic performance, Structural resilience, Vulnerability assessment",
author = "S. Elias and M. Beer and J. Chen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120002",
language = "English",
volume = "331",
journal = "Engineering structures",
issn = "0141-0296",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing seismic vulnerability of modular buildings under earthquake ground motions

AU - Elias, S.

AU - Beer, M.

AU - Chen, J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2025/5/15

Y1 - 2025/5/15

N2 - In earthquake-prone regions like Iceland, where an average of 500 earthquakes occurs weekly, modular buildings constructed according to EU standards encounter significant seismic challenges. This study investigates the seismic performance of nonlinear modular building models under both near-field pulse-type ground motions and fully non-stationary non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions, generated through Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Latinized Partially Stratified Sampling (LPSS) methods. Key structural response parameters, including inter-story drift, base shear, and acceleration, are analyzed, with their probability distribution functions (PDFs) and fragility functions evaluated against industry-standard limit states, such as those defined by FEMA. Results reveal that pulse-type ground motions, characterized by large, high-velocity pulses, result in a higher probability of failure, especially in the width direction, compared to non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions. The top floor exhibits greater vulnerability under seismic forces, underscoring the need for focused structural reinforcement. The findings highlight the importance of considering both pulse-type and non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions in structural design practices and seismic codes to enhance the resilience and safety of modular buildings in earthquake-prone areas. This study contributes to the seismic engineering field by providing insights into the vulnerability and robustness of modular structures under diverse seismic loading conditions.

AB - In earthquake-prone regions like Iceland, where an average of 500 earthquakes occurs weekly, modular buildings constructed according to EU standards encounter significant seismic challenges. This study investigates the seismic performance of nonlinear modular building models under both near-field pulse-type ground motions and fully non-stationary non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions, generated through Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Latinized Partially Stratified Sampling (LPSS) methods. Key structural response parameters, including inter-story drift, base shear, and acceleration, are analyzed, with their probability distribution functions (PDFs) and fragility functions evaluated against industry-standard limit states, such as those defined by FEMA. Results reveal that pulse-type ground motions, characterized by large, high-velocity pulses, result in a higher probability of failure, especially in the width direction, compared to non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions. The top floor exhibits greater vulnerability under seismic forces, underscoring the need for focused structural reinforcement. The findings highlight the importance of considering both pulse-type and non-pulse-like stochastic ground motions in structural design practices and seismic codes to enhance the resilience and safety of modular buildings in earthquake-prone areas. This study contributes to the seismic engineering field by providing insights into the vulnerability and robustness of modular structures under diverse seismic loading conditions.

KW - Near-field ground motions

KW - Nonlinear modular buildings

KW - Seismic performance

KW - Structural resilience

KW - Vulnerability assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219099076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120002

DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85219099076

VL - 331

JO - Engineering structures

JF - Engineering structures

SN - 0141-0296

M1 - 120002

ER -

Von denselben Autoren